Literature DB >> 23895448

Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Sven Hohenstein1, Reinhold Kliegl1.   

Abstract

Word features in parafoveal vision influence eye movements during reading. The question of whether readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words was studied in 3 experiments by using a gaze-contingent display change technique. Subjects read German sentences containing 1 of several preview words that were replaced by a target word during the saccade to the preview (boundary paradigm). In the 1st experiment the preview word was semantically related or unrelated to the target. Fixation durations on the target were shorter for semantically related than unrelated previews, consistent with a semantic preview benefit. In the 2nd experiment, half the sentences were presented following the rules of German spelling (i.e., previews and targets were printed with an initial capital letter), and the other half were presented completely in lowercase. A semantic preview benefit was obtained under both conditions. In the 3rd experiment, we introduced 2 further preview conditions, an identical word and a pronounceable nonword, while also manipulating the text contrast. Whereas the contrast had negligible effects, fixation durations on the target were reliably different for all 4 types of preview. Semantic preview benefits were greater for pretarget fixations closer to the boundary (large preview space) and, although not as consistently, for long pretarget fixation durations (long preview time). The results constrain theoretical proposals about eye movement control in reading. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895448     DOI: 10.1037/a0033670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  41 in total

1.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.

Authors:  Dan W Teng; Sebastian Wallot; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

6.  Cross-language parafoveal semantic processing: Evidence from Korean-Chinese bilinguals.

Authors:  Aiping Wang; Junmo Yeon; Wei Zhou; Hua Shu; Ming Yan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

7.  Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text.

Authors:  Eliza Barach; Laurie Beth Feldman; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-28

8.  Role of consciousness in temporal integration of semantic information.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Yung-Hsuan Tien; Pei-Ling Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Nan Li; Suiping Wang; Timothy J Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

10.  [Localization of scotomas in AMD by reading test : Random series of words in standardized format].

Authors:  W Eisenbarth; U Pado; S Schriever; D Schötschel; N Feucht; M MacKeben
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.