Literature DB >> 26594098

What Eye Movements Reveal about Deaf Readers.

Nathalie N Bélanger1, Keith Rayner1.   

Abstract

Levels of illiteracy in the deaf populations around the world have been extremely high for decades and much higher than the illiteracy levels found in the general population. Research has mostly focused on deaf readers' difficulties rather than on their strengths, which can then inform reading education. Deaf readers are a unique population. They process language and the world surrounding them mostly via the visual channel and this greatly affects how they read or might learn to read. The study of eye movements in reading provides highly sophisticated information about how words and sentences are processed and our research with deaf readers reveals the importance of their uniqueness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deaf readers; eye movements; perceptual span; reading skill; word processing

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594098      PMCID: PMC4651440          DOI: 10.1177/0963721414567527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0963-7214


  25 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis.

Authors:  E Matin
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.

Authors:  Jason Proksch; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Jinger Pan; Nathalie N Bélanger; Hua Shu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Frequency and Predictability Effects in Eye Fixations for Skilled and Less-Skilled Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  An ERP investigation of orthographic precision in deaf and hearing readers.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Orthographic and phonological selectivity across the reading system in deaf skilled readers.

Authors:  Laurie S Glezer; Jill Weisberg; Cindy O'Grady Farnady; Stephen McCullough; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  ERP effects of masked orthographic neighbour priming in deaf readers.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  The neurocognitive basis of skilled reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Brittany Lee
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2021-02-26

5.  Unmasking individual differences in adult reading procedures by disrupting holistic orthographic perception.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Travis Simcox; Corrine Durisko; Charles A Perfetti; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computerized Sign Language-Based Literacy Training for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.

Authors:  Emil Holmer; Mikael Heimann; Mary Rudner
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2017-10-01

7.  Evidence of an Effect of Gaming Experience on Visuospatial Attention in Deaf but Not in Hearing Individuals.

Authors:  Emil Holmer; Mary Rudner; Krister Schönström; Josefine Andin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.