Literature DB >> 22042596

Parafoveal processing in reading.

Elizabeth R Schotter1, Bernhard Angele, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

The present review summarizes research investigating how words are identified parafoveally (and foveally) in reading. Parafoveal and foveal processing are compared when no other concurrent task is required (e.g., in single-word recognition tasks) and when both are required simultaneously (e.g., during reading). We first review methodologies used to study parafoveal processing (e.g., corpus analyses and experimental manipulations, including gaze-contingent display change experiments such as the boundary, moving window, moving mask, and fast priming paradigms). We then turn to a discussion of the levels of representation at which words are processed (e.g., orthographic, phonological, morphological, lexical, syntactic, and semantic). Next, we review relevant research regarding parafoveal processing, summarizing the extent to which words are processed at each of those levels of representation. We then review some of the most controversial aspects of parafoveal processing, as they relate to reading: (1) word skipping, (2) parafoveal-on-foveal effects, and (3) n + 1 and n + 2 preview benefit effects. Finally, we summarize two of the most advanced models of eye movements during reading and how they address foveal and parafoveal processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22042596     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  103 in total

1.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 2.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Preview benefit in speaking occurs regardless of preview timing.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

4.  Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

7.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Stress matters revisited: a boundary change experiment.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The effect of letter-stroke boldness on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Girish Kumar; Jasmine Junge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.