Literature DB >> 25181368

It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Renske S Hoedemaker1, Peter C Gordon1.   

Abstract

Two eye-tracking experiments were conducted in which the manual response mode typically used in lexical decision tasks (LDTs) was replaced with an eye-movement response through a sequence of 3 words. This ocular LDT combines the explicit control of task goals found in LDTs with the highly practiced ocular response used in reading text. In Experiment 1, forward saccades indicated an affirmative lexical decision (LD) on each word in the triplet. In Experiment 2, LD responses were delayed until all 3 letter strings had been read. The goal of the study was to evaluate the contribution of task goals and response mode to semantic priming. Semantic priming is very robust in tasks that involve recognition of words in isolation, such as LDT, but limited during text reading, as measured using eye movements. Gaze durations in both experiments showed robust semantic priming even though ocular response times were much shorter than manual LDs for the same words in the English Lexicon Project. Ex-Gaussian distribution fits revealed that the priming effect was concentrated in estimates of tau (τ), meaning that priming was most pronounced in the slow tail of the distribution. This pattern shows differential use of the prime information, which may be more heavily recruited in cases in which the LD is difficult, as indicated by longer response times. Compared with the manual LD responses, ocular LDs provide a more sensitive measure of this task-related influence on word recognition as measured by the LDT. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25181368      PMCID: PMC4244277          DOI: 10.1037/a0037677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  62 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.

Authors:  Stephen J Lupker; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

6.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: the role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.

Authors:  D E Keefe; J H Neely
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

7.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Speech-in-speech perception and executive function involvement.

Authors:  Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Maxime Tassin; Fanny Meunier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.