Key Young Oang1, Jong Goo Kim1, Cheolhee Yang1, Tae Wu Kim1, Youngmin Kim1, Kyung Hwan Kim1, Jeongho Kim2, Hyotcherl Ihee1. 1. Center for Nanomaterials and Chemical Reactions, Institute for Basic Science (IBS) , Daejeon 305-701, Korea ; Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Nanoscience & Technology (WCU), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) , Daejeon 305-701, Korea. 2. Department of Chemistry, Inha University , Incheon 402-751, Korea.
Abstract
Conformational substates of proteins are generally considered to play important roles in regulating protein functions, but an understanding of how they influence the structural dynamics and functions of the proteins has been elusive. Here, we investigate the structural dynamics of sperm whale myoglobin associated with the conformational substates using picosecond X-ray solution scattering. By applying kinetic analysis considering all of the plausible candidate models, we establish a kinetic model for the entire cycle of the protein transition in a wide time range from 100 ps to 10 ms. Four structurally distinct intermediates are formed during the cycle, and most importantly, the transition from the first intermediate to the second one (B → C) occurs biphasically. We attribute the biphasic kinetics to the involvement of two conformational substates of the first intermediate, which are generated by the interplay between the distal histidine and the photodissociated CO.
Conformational substates of proteins are generally considered to play important roles in regulating protein functions, but an understanding of how they influence the structural dynamics and functions of the proteins has been elusive. Here, we investigate the structural dynamics of sperm whalemyoglobin associated with the conformational substates using picosecond X-ray solution scattering. By applying kinetic analysis considering all of the plausible candidate models, we establish a kinetic model for the entire cycle of the protein transition in a wide time range from 100 ps to 10 ms. Four structurally distinct intermediates are formed during the cycle, and most importantly, the transition from the first intermediate to the second one (B → C) occurs biphasically. We attribute the biphasic kinetics to the involvement of two conformational substates of the first intermediate, which are generated by the interplay between the distal histidine and the photodissociated CO.
At equilibrium, proteins in
a certain state undergo continuous structural fluctuation and can
exist in a number of conformational substates. In contrast, when performing
their biological functions, proteins undergo nonequilibrium structural
transitions from one state to another while spanning many conformational
substates of each state. Such a nonequilibrium transition among the
substates belonging to different states is more relevant to the protein
function than the equilibrium interconversion among the substates
of a given state. Because the dynamics and function of a protein are
often governed by its structure, they can be presumably modulated
depending on which conformational substates of a state become populated
in the course of nonequilibrium protein transitions. Thus far, however,
it has been challenging to determine even the dynamics of the transitions
among various states let alone among conformational substates of proteins.
Here, we report an example of protein structural transition where
the existence of two conformational substates in a state indeed induces
different kinetics in the nonequilibrium transition from the state
to another.Myoglobin (Mb) is a heme protein that transports and stores small
ligands such as oxygen in muscles. Due to its small size and availability,
the photosensitivity of the heme–ligand bond, and the existence
of conformational substates, Mb has served as a model system for exploring
the relationships between dynamics, function, and structure of proteins.[1−7] According to infrared (IR) absorption spectra of Mb ligated with
CO ligands (MbCO)[1,8] and CO-photolyzed Mb[9−12] in the frequency region of CO stretching, CO ligands move from the
binding site (denoted as the A state) at the heme to
the primary docking site (denoted as the B state) in
the distal heme pocket in a few picoseconds.[9−12] Also, multiple stretching bands
for the CO ligands in A and B states were
identified, suggesting that there exist several conformational substates
belonging to A and B states of the protein.[1,8−12] These bands are conventionally denoted as A (1965 cm–1), A (1945 cm–1), and A (1932 cm–1) for the substates
of the A state[1,8] and B (2149 cm–1), B (2131 cm–1), and B (2119 cm–1) for
the substates of the B state.[9−12] These conformational substates
of A and B states arise from various conformations
of distal histidine (especially its imidazole ring) in the primary
docking site relative to the CO ligands.[8,10,11,13] As the CO stretching
frequency is higher, the interaction between the distal histidine
and the CO ligands is weaker.[11,13,14] The dynamics of equilibrium interconversion among the conformational
substates of MbCO were measured using ultrafast two-dimensional IR
echo spectroscopy[15] and time-resolved IR
spectroscopy.[14] Also, the dynamics of nonequilibrium
transition among the conformational substates belonging to A and B states were estimated using time-resolved IR
spectroscopy[9−11] and nonequilibrium two-dimensional IR echo spectroscopy.[12] All of these previous studies were made based
on the IR absorption spectra of the protein in the frequency region
of CO stretching, which are highly sensitive to the change of local
structure of the protein, for example, the trajectory and the orientation
of the CO ligands. However, functionally relevant, global structural
change involved in these nonequilibrium transitions among conformational
substates belonging to different intermediate states of Mb may be
decoupled from the ligand migration and thus remain poorly understood.In this work, we investigate the real-time structural dynamics
of the transitions among intermediate states of Mb in solution. To
do so, we applied picosecond X-ray solution scattering that is globally
sensitive to secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structural changes
of proteins in solution.[5−7,16,17] Ideally, structural refinement using the
picosecond X-ray solution scattering data can reveal subtle movements
of constituents such as α-helices.[5,17] However, even
without such detailed structural analysis, these data can be, at the
very least, treated as transient absorption (TA) spectra containing
much more structural information than typical TA spectra due to intrinsic
structural sensitivity of the X-ray scattering signal. From the kinetic
analysis of the data, we can resolve all of the kinetic components
such as the number of intermediates, their associated time constants,
and the optimum kinetic model with high fidelity. Here, we focus on
such kinetic aspects of the X-ray solution scattering data to assemble
a puzzle of dynamics, function, and structure of proteins.Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), following photoexcitation
are shown in Figure 1. The measured data were
analyzed by applying singular value decomposition (SVD) and kinetic
analyses to extract the kinetics of the structural change of Mb. From
SVD of the experimental data in the q range of 0.15–1.0
Å–1 and the time range of 100 ps–10
ms, four significant singular components (that is, four structurally
distinct intermediates) were identified, which is consistent with
previous studies using flash photolysis[18] and transient grating (TG) spectroscopy.[3] The relaxation times for these singular components were determined
by simultaneously fitting four principal time-dependent singular components
(right singular vectors; rSVs) multiplied by singular values using
a sum of six exponentials sharing common relaxation times. From the
fitting, we obtained the relaxation times of 460 ± 160 ps, 3.6
± 0.7 ns, 92 ± 25 ns, 1.4 ± 0.2 μs, 90 ±
20 μs, and 1.2 ± 0.2 ms. Details of the SVD analysis are
described in section 4.1 of the Supporting Information
(SI). To verify the validity of using six exponentials for
the fit, we tried to fit using fewer or more exponentials. If we use
five exponentials, the fit quality clearly becomes worse, even for
the most dominant first rSV component. If we use seven exponentials,
overfitting occurs. Therefore, it is adequate to use six exponentials
for fitting the data (see Figure S4 in the SI for details). Subsequently, the obtained relaxation times were used
in the kinetic analysis based on a kinetic model.
Figure 1
Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), measured for a
solution sample of wild-type sperm whale MbCO. The time delay after
photoexcitation is indicated above each curve. Experimental curves
(black) are compared with theoretical curves (red) that were generated
from linear combinations of four time-independent species-associated
difference scattering curves extracted from the kinetic analysis using
the model shown in Figure 3a.
Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), measured for a
solution sample of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO. The time delay after
photoexcitation is indicated above each curve. Experimental curves
(black) are compared with theoretical curves (red) that were generated
from linear combinations of four time-independent species-associated
difference scattering curves extracted from the kinetic analysis using
the model shown in Figure 3a.
Figure 3
The result of kinetic analysis using an optimum kinetic model.
(a) The optimum kinetic model that best describes the structural dynamics
of wild-type sperm whale MbCO induced by CO photolysis. (b) Population
changes of the four intermediates with respect to the pump–probe
time delay. The lines correspond to the populations obtained from
the kinetic analysis of the experimental data, and the symbols correspond
to the optimized populations at the time delay points where experimental
data were measured.
It is clear that the last two relaxation components with the time
constants of 90 μs and 1.2 ms represent the recovery of the
ground-state MbCO (carbonmonoxy structure) from the last (fourth)
intermediate (deoxy structure) via bimolecular (that is, nonexponential)
nongeminate CO recombination accompanied by tertiary structural changes
of the protein.[17,19,20] Then, the earlier four relaxation components must account for the
multistep transitions from the first intermediate to the last one
via tertiary structural changes. Because there are four relaxation
components associated with the transitions among the four intermediates,
one of the relaxation components must be associated with either a
parallel (that is, biphasic) or bypass pathway. To identify which
relaxation component is associated with such a pathway, we additionally
performed the SVD analysis in a reduced time range (100 ps–3.16
ns), whose upper limit is close to the value of the second relaxation
time (3.6 ns) from the above SVD analysis performed in the entire
time range (100 ps–10 ms). Figures 2a and 2b show the first four left singular
vectors (lSVs) in the entire time range and in the reduced time range,
respectively. We can clearly see that, regardless of the time range
of SVD analysis, both the first and the second lSVs in q space have significant oscillatory features. In contrast, the third
and the fourth lSVs do not have any distinct features in the reduced
time range. From these results of the SVD analyses, we learned that
two structurally distinguishable intermediates exist in the time range
from 100 ps to 3.16 ns and thus must be responsible for the first
two relaxation components (460 ps and 3.6 ns).
Figure 2
The result of SVD analysis in two different time ranges. (a) The
first four lSVs in the entire time range (100 ps–10 ms) are
shown. Four singular components of significant amplitudes were identified
in the entire time range. The third and the fourth lSVs are rather
noisy, but they clearly have distinct oscillatory features, as can
be seen in the comparison with the first lSV (red dotted lines) superimposed
on them. (b) The first four lSVs in the reduced time range (100 ps–3.16
ns) are shown. Two singular components of significant amplitudes were
identified in this reduced time range.
The result of SVD analysis in two different time ranges. (a) The
first four lSVs in the entire time range (100 ps–10 ms) are
shown. Four singular components of significant amplitudes were identified
in the entire time range. The third and the fourth lSVs are rather
noisy, but they clearly have distinct oscillatory features, as can
be seen in the comparison with the first lSV (red dotted lines) superimposed
on them. (b) The first four lSVs in the reduced time range (100 ps–3.16
ns) are shown. Two singular components of significant amplitudes were
identified in this reduced time range.On the basis of the results of the SVD analysis, we generated all
possible kinetic models (see models a–r in Figure S6 in the SI). Among a total
of 18 candidate models, only models a–d are consistent with the SVD analysis in the entire time range as
well as in the reduced time range. For example, model c has four structurally distinct intermediates in the entire time
range and two intermediates in the reduced time range, which is in
agreement with the results of the SVD analyses in the two time ranges.
In contrast, models e–r are consistent
only with the SVD analysis in the entire time range. For example,
model e has four intermediates in the entire time range
and three intermediates in the reduced time range, contradicting the
result of the SVD analysis in the reduced time range. Then, using
the four significant singular vectors obtained from the SVD analysis,
we performed the kinetic analysis for each candidate kinetic model
in order to determine the optimum kinetic model that best fits the
experimental data. In the kinetic analysis, a theoretical time-resolved
difference scattering curve (red curves in Figure 1) at each time delay was generated as a linear combination
of four principal time-independent singular components in q space (that is, lSVs). The time evolution of the theoretical
scattering curves can be described using a set of variable kinetic
parameters based on a candidate kinetic model (for example, one of
the kinetic models in Figure S6 in the SI). By minimizing the discrepancy (quantified by the χ2 value) between the experimental and the theoretical time-resolved
difference scattering curves, we optimized the kinetic parameters
of each candidate kinetic model. By comparing the minimized χ2 values (listed in Table S1 in the SI) of all of the candidate models, we determined the optimum kinetic
model and extracted the species-associated difference scattering curves
of the four intermediate species. Details of the kinetic analysis
are described in section 4.2 of the SI.From the kinetic analysis, we found that model c shown
in Figure 3a gives
the smallest χ2 value among the 18 candidate models.
In particular, after minimization of the χ2 value
for each candidate kinetic model, only model c has nonzero
contribution from the parallel pathway among models a–d that have a parallel pathway in the reduced
time range (100 ps–3.16 ns), as can be seen in Figure S6 (SI). In other words, only model c is in agreement with the results of both SVD and kinetic analyses.
Thus, we unambiguously determined that the most adequate model for
describing the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO is
model c. In this model, the four intermediates are termed B, C, D, and S in the
order of appearance in time. Notably, this kinetic model involves
(1) the biphasic transition from the first intermediate (B) to the second one (C) and (2) the bimolecular nongeminate
CO recombination of the last intermediate (S). On the
basis of the results of the kinetic analysis, the first two relaxation
components with time constants of 460 ps and 3.6 ns identified in
the SVD analysis can be assigned to the biphasic transition between
the B and C intermediates.The result of kinetic analysis using an optimum kinetic model.
(a) The optimum kinetic model that best describes the structural dynamics
of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO induced by CO photolysis. (b) Population
changes of the four intermediates with respect to the pump–probe
time delay. The lines correspond to the populations obtained from
the kinetic analysis of the experimental data, and the symbols correspond
to the optimized populations at the time delay points where experimental
data were measured.To investigate the structural dynamics of Mb in detail, we examined
the time-dependent population changes of the four intermediates as
shown in Figure 3b. The first intermediate
(B) is formed within 100 ps, which is the time resolution
of our experiment. In previous studies on MbCO undergoing CO photolysis
under physiological conditions using time-resolved IR spectroscopy,
an intermediate corresponding to B was observed on the
time scale of several picoseconds.[10,12] In particular,
two different bands of CO stretching were distinguished spectroscopically
and kinetically in the transient IR spectra.[10,12] These two bands were considered to arise from the change of the
histidine–CO interaction induced by two different orientations
of photodissociated COs in the primary docking site, implying the
existence of two conformational substates of the B intermediate.[9−12] It was interpreted that each substate of B originates
from both A and A substates of the ground-state MbCO,[9−12] and the substates of B were denoted as B and B in the order of decreasing CO stretching frequency.[9−12] Then, we could infer that the B → C transition occurs biphasically because both B and B are involved
in the tertiary structural relaxation associated with the B → C transition, which accompanies the movement
of the photodissociated CO from the primary docking site to the Xe4
site.[3,21,22] According
to an IR spectroscopic study by Nienhaus et al.,[11]B has a higher CO
stretching frequency and thus exhibits a weaker histidine–CO
interaction than B. Therefore,
the fast (460 ps) and slow (3.6 ns) relaxation components can be presumably
assigned to B → C and B → C transitions, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 3b, the relative population ratio of these two transitions
is 46/54%, with an error value of 2%. The biphasic transition from B to C has never been clearly resolved in previous
studies using various spectroscopic tools,[9−12,23,24] even with time-resolved IR spectroscopy.[9−12] The lack of the biphasic transition in the time-resolved IR spectra
suggests that the transition from B to C may involve both local and global structural changes of the protein
because global structural changes are generally detectable only with
direct structural tools.[5−7,16,17]Following the B → C transition, C transforms to the third intermediate (D) with
a time constant of 92 ns, and D further proceeds to the
last intermediate (S) with a time constant of 1.4 μs.
The C → D and D → S transitions correspond to tertiary structural relaxations
of Mb to its deoxy structure and accompany the movements of the photodissociated
CO (1) from the Xe4 site to the Xe1 site and (2) from the Xe1 site
to the solvent environment, respectively.[3] For C, D, and S, no biphasic
kinetics were observed. This observation implies that those intermediates
do not have any conformational substates governed by the histidine–CO
interaction, probably because of the escape of the photodissociated
CO from the primary docking site.[3,21,22] Alternatively, if any conformational substates exist
for the C, D, and S intermediates,
the intrastate transitions among the substates of those intermediate
states may occur much faster than the interstate transitions of C → D and D → S, resulting in single-exponential dynamics of the interstate
transitions.[14] Finally, S (deoxy
structure) returns to the structure of the ground-state MbCO (carbonmonoxy
structure) via bimolecular nongeminate CO recombination with a rate
of 230 ± 10 mM–1 s–1, which
can be approximated by a combination of two unimolecular time constants
of 90 μs and 1.2 ms.[17,19,20] Figure 4 summarizes the detailed scheme for
the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO, especially highlighting
the movements of the CO.
Figure 4
Detailed scheme for the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whale
MbCO. In particular, the movements of the CO molecule are highlighted.
Yellow spheres indicate the locations of the CO for A, B, C, D, and S states. The CO ligated to the heme (A) is dissociated
by the laser pulse centered at 532 nm. The photodissociated CO moves
from the primary docking site (B) via the Xe4 site (C) to the Xe1 site (D) and finally to the solvent
environment (S). The interplay between the distal histidine
and the CO generates the conformational substates of A and B. In particular, due to the existence of the two
conformational substates of B, the transition from B to C exhibits biphasic kinetics.
Detailed scheme for the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO. In particular, the movements of the CO molecule are highlighted.
Yellow spheres indicate the locations of the CO for A, B, C, D, and S states. The CO ligated to the heme (A) is dissociated
by the laser pulse centered at 532 nm. The photodissociated CO moves
from the primary docking site (B) via the Xe4 site (C) to the Xe1 site (D) and finally to the solvent
environment (S). The interplay between the distal histidine
and the CO generates the conformational substates of A and B. In particular, due to the existence of the two
conformational substates of B, the transition from B to C exhibits biphasic kinetics.The present work can be compared with previous studies on MbCO
performed using time-resolved X-ray solution scattering,[5−7] as summarized in Table S2 and detailed in section 5 of the SI. A study by Kim et al.[6] investigated structural dynamics of wild-type horse heart MbCO in
the time range from 100 ps to 1 μs. In contrast, our present
work investigates the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO in a wider time range (100 ps–10 ms) than in that ref (6). A work by Cho et al.[7] is equivalent to our present work in terms of
the experimental technique, sample, time range, and number of time
points. The key difference between ref (7) and our present work is that ref (7) used only a sequential
kinetic model while our present work considered all of the plausible
candidate models (based on the SVD analysis) in the kinetic analysis
to determine the optimum kinetic model with much higher fidelity.
In fact, the kinetic model employed in ref (7) is identical to one of the candidate models (model r in Figure S6 in the SI) examined
in our present work, and all of the evidence presented in our present
work demonstrates that model r is not an optimum model.In this work, we comprehensively elucidated the multistep structural
dynamics of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO induced by CO photolysis using
picosecond X-ray solution scattering measured from 100 ps to 10 ms
after photolysis. In particular, by combining the results of the SVD
and kinetic analyses for a total of 18 candidate models, we established
the most adequate kinetic model. This optimum model includes a biphasic
transition from the first intermediate to the second one (B → C) and bimolecular nongeminate CO recombination.
Our approach of combining picosecond X-ray solution scattering, SVD
analysis in variable time ranges, and subsequent kinetic analysis
provides a convenient tool for determining the optimum kinetic model
with high fidelity and can be further applied to other systems.
Methods
Picosecond X-ray solution scattering data were acquired using the
pump–probe method at the BioCARS 14-ID-B beamline at the Advanced
Photon Source (APS) while the storage ring was operated in the standard
top-up mode. Aqueous solution samples of wild-type sperm whaleMbCO
were prepared at a 8 mM concentration in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer
at pH 7.0 using a previously established protocol. Photodissociation
of MbCO was initiated by exciting the MbCO solution contained in a
capillary of 1 mm thickness with a 35 ps long laser pulse at 532 nm.
Subsequently, a ∼100 ps long X-ray pulse probed the sample,
and the scattered X-ray photons were recorded as a function of the
time delay between the laser pump pulse and the X-ray probe pulse.
Time-resolved scattering curves were collected at 33 pump–probe
time delays in the range from 100 ps to 10 ms (four time points per
decade). Taking the difference between the scattering curve measured
at each time delay point and the reference scattering curve measured
at −5 μs yielded the difference scattering curve, ΔS(q,t). The contribution
from laser-induced solvent heating was removed from the measured scattering
curves. The details of the experiment and the data processing are
provided in the SI.
Authors: Haruto Ishikawa; Kyungwon Kwak; Jean K Chung; Seongheun Kim; Michael D Fayer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: James E Knapp; Reinhard Pahl; Jordi Cohen; Jeffry C Nichols; Klaus Schulten; Quentin H Gibson; Vukica Srajer; William E Royer Journal: Structure Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Mahsa Silatani; Frederico A Lima; Thomas J Penfold; Jochen Rittmann; Marco E Reinhard; Hannelore M Rittmann-Frank; Camelia Borca; Daniel Grolimund; Christopher J Milne; Majed Chergui Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matteo Levantino; Giorgio Schirò; Henrik Till Lemke; Grazia Cottone; James Michael Glownia; Diling Zhu; Mathieu Chollet; Hyotcherl Ihee; Antonio Cupane; Marco Cammarata Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 14.919