Literature DB >> 24761190

Conformational Substates of Myoglobin Intermediate Resolved by Picosecond X-ray Solution Scattering.

Key Young Oang1, Jong Goo Kim1, Cheolhee Yang1, Tae Wu Kim1, Youngmin Kim1, Kyung Hwan Kim1, Jeongho Kim2, Hyotcherl Ihee1.   

Abstract

Conformational substates of proteins are generally considered to play important roles in regulating protein functions, but an understanding of how they influence the structural dynamics and functions of the proteins has been elusive. Here, we investigate the structural dynamics of sperm whale myoglobin associated with the conformational substates using picosecond X-ray solution scattering. By applying kinetic analysis considering all of the plausible candidate models, we establish a kinetic model for the entire cycle of the protein transition in a wide time range from 100 ps to 10 ms. Four structurally distinct intermediates are formed during the cycle, and most importantly, the transition from the first intermediate to the second one (B → C) occurs biphasically. We attribute the biphasic kinetics to the involvement of two conformational substates of the first intermediate, which are generated by the interplay between the distal histidine and the photodissociated CO.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24761190      PMCID: PMC3985870          DOI: 10.1021/jz4027425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-7185            Impact factor:   6.475


At equilibrium, proteins in a certain state undergo continuous structural fluctuation and can exist in a number of conformational substates. In contrast, when performing their biological functions, proteins undergo nonequilibrium structural transitions from one state to another while spanning many conformational substates of each state. Such a nonequilibrium transition among the substates belonging to different states is more relevant to the protein function than the equilibrium interconversion among the substates of a given state. Because the dynamics and function of a protein are often governed by its structure, they can be presumably modulated depending on which conformational substates of a state become populated in the course of nonequilibrium protein transitions. Thus far, however, it has been challenging to determine even the dynamics of the transitions among various states let alone among conformational substates of proteins. Here, we report an example of protein structural transition where the existence of two conformational substates in a state indeed induces different kinetics in the nonequilibrium transition from the state to another. Myoglobin (Mb) is a heme protein that transports and stores small ligands such as oxygen in muscles. Due to its small size and availability, the photosensitivity of the heme–ligand bond, and the existence of conformational substates, Mb has served as a model system for exploring the relationships between dynamics, function, and structure of proteins.[1−7] According to infrared (IR) absorption spectra of Mb ligated with CO ligands (MbCO)[1,8] and CO-photolyzed Mb[9−12] in the frequency region of CO stretching, CO ligands move from the binding site (denoted as the A state) at the heme to the primary docking site (denoted as the B state) in the distal heme pocket in a few picoseconds.[9−12] Also, multiple stretching bands for the CO ligands in A and B states were identified, suggesting that there exist several conformational substates belonging to A and B states of the protein.[1,8−12] These bands are conventionally denoted as A (1965 cm–1), A (1945 cm–1), and A (1932 cm–1) for the substates of the A state[1,8] and B (2149 cm–1), B (2131 cm–1), and B (2119 cm–1) for the substates of the B state.[9−12] These conformational substates of A and B states arise from various conformations of distal histidine (especially its imidazole ring) in the primary docking site relative to the CO ligands.[8,10,11,13] As the CO stretching frequency is higher, the interaction between the distal histidine and the CO ligands is weaker.[11,13,14] The dynamics of equilibrium interconversion among the conformational substates of MbCO were measured using ultrafast two-dimensional IR echo spectroscopy[15] and time-resolved IR spectroscopy.[14] Also, the dynamics of nonequilibrium transition among the conformational substates belonging to A and B states were estimated using time-resolved IR spectroscopy[9−11] and nonequilibrium two-dimensional IR echo spectroscopy.[12] All of these previous studies were made based on the IR absorption spectra of the protein in the frequency region of CO stretching, which are highly sensitive to the change of local structure of the protein, for example, the trajectory and the orientation of the CO ligands. However, functionally relevant, global structural change involved in these nonequilibrium transitions among conformational substates belonging to different intermediate states of Mb may be decoupled from the ligand migration and thus remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the real-time structural dynamics of the transitions among intermediate states of Mb in solution. To do so, we applied picosecond X-ray solution scattering that is globally sensitive to secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structural changes of proteins in solution.[5−7,16,17] Ideally, structural refinement using the picosecond X-ray solution scattering data can reveal subtle movements of constituents such as α-helices.[5,17] However, even without such detailed structural analysis, these data can be, at the very least, treated as transient absorption (TA) spectra containing much more structural information than typical TA spectra due to intrinsic structural sensitivity of the X-ray scattering signal. From the kinetic analysis of the data, we can resolve all of the kinetic components such as the number of intermediates, their associated time constants, and the optimum kinetic model with high fidelity. Here, we focus on such kinetic aspects of the X-ray solution scattering data to assemble a puzzle of dynamics, function, and structure of proteins. Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), following photoexcitation are shown in Figure 1. The measured data were analyzed by applying singular value decomposition (SVD) and kinetic analyses to extract the kinetics of the structural change of Mb. From SVD of the experimental data in the q range of 0.15–1.0 Å–1 and the time range of 100 ps–10 ms, four significant singular components (that is, four structurally distinct intermediates) were identified, which is consistent with previous studies using flash photolysis[18] and transient grating (TG) spectroscopy.[3] The relaxation times for these singular components were determined by simultaneously fitting four principal time-dependent singular components (right singular vectors; rSVs) multiplied by singular values using a sum of six exponentials sharing common relaxation times. From the fitting, we obtained the relaxation times of 460 ± 160 ps, 3.6 ± 0.7 ns, 92 ± 25 ns, 1.4 ± 0.2 μs, 90 ± 20 μs, and 1.2 ± 0.2 ms. Details of the SVD analysis are described in section 4.1 of the Supporting Information (SI). To verify the validity of using six exponentials for the fit, we tried to fit using fewer or more exponentials. If we use five exponentials, the fit quality clearly becomes worse, even for the most dominant first rSV component. If we use seven exponentials, overfitting occurs. Therefore, it is adequate to use six exponentials for fitting the data (see Figure S4 in the SI for details). Subsequently, the obtained relaxation times were used in the kinetic analysis based on a kinetic model.
Figure 1

Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), measured for a solution sample of wild-type sperm whale MbCO. The time delay after photoexcitation is indicated above each curve. Experimental curves (black) are compared with theoretical curves (red) that were generated from linear combinations of four time-independent species-associated difference scattering curves extracted from the kinetic analysis using the model shown in Figure 3a.

Time-resolved difference X-ray solution scattering curves, ΔS(q,t), measured for a solution sample of wild-type sperm whale MbCO. The time delay after photoexcitation is indicated above each curve. Experimental curves (black) are compared with theoretical curves (red) that were generated from linear combinations of four time-independent species-associated difference scattering curves extracted from the kinetic analysis using the model shown in Figure 3a.
Figure 3

The result of kinetic analysis using an optimum kinetic model. (a) The optimum kinetic model that best describes the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whale MbCO induced by CO photolysis. (b) Population changes of the four intermediates with respect to the pump–probe time delay. The lines correspond to the populations obtained from the kinetic analysis of the experimental data, and the symbols correspond to the optimized populations at the time delay points where experimental data were measured.

It is clear that the last two relaxation components with the time constants of 90 μs and 1.2 ms represent the recovery of the ground-state MbCO (carbonmonoxy structure) from the last (fourth) intermediate (deoxy structure) via bimolecular (that is, nonexponential) nongeminate CO recombination accompanied by tertiary structural changes of the protein.[17,19,20] Then, the earlier four relaxation components must account for the multistep transitions from the first intermediate to the last one via tertiary structural changes. Because there are four relaxation components associated with the transitions among the four intermediates, one of the relaxation components must be associated with either a parallel (that is, biphasic) or bypass pathway. To identify which relaxation component is associated with such a pathway, we additionally performed the SVD analysis in a reduced time range (100 ps–3.16 ns), whose upper limit is close to the value of the second relaxation time (3.6 ns) from the above SVD analysis performed in the entire time range (100 ps–10 ms). Figures 2a and 2b show the first four left singular vectors (lSVs) in the entire time range and in the reduced time range, respectively. We can clearly see that, regardless of the time range of SVD analysis, both the first and the second lSVs in q space have significant oscillatory features. In contrast, the third and the fourth lSVs do not have any distinct features in the reduced time range. From these results of the SVD analyses, we learned that two structurally distinguishable intermediates exist in the time range from 100 ps to 3.16 ns and thus must be responsible for the first two relaxation components (460 ps and 3.6 ns).
Figure 2

The result of SVD analysis in two different time ranges. (a) The first four lSVs in the entire time range (100 ps–10 ms) are shown. Four singular components of significant amplitudes were identified in the entire time range. The third and the fourth lSVs are rather noisy, but they clearly have distinct oscillatory features, as can be seen in the comparison with the first lSV (red dotted lines) superimposed on them. (b) The first four lSVs in the reduced time range (100 ps–3.16 ns) are shown. Two singular components of significant amplitudes were identified in this reduced time range.

The result of SVD analysis in two different time ranges. (a) The first four lSVs in the entire time range (100 ps–10 ms) are shown. Four singular components of significant amplitudes were identified in the entire time range. The third and the fourth lSVs are rather noisy, but they clearly have distinct oscillatory features, as can be seen in the comparison with the first lSV (red dotted lines) superimposed on them. (b) The first four lSVs in the reduced time range (100 ps–3.16 ns) are shown. Two singular components of significant amplitudes were identified in this reduced time range. On the basis of the results of the SVD analysis, we generated all possible kinetic models (see models a–r in Figure S6 in the SI). Among a total of 18 candidate models, only models a–d are consistent with the SVD analysis in the entire time range as well as in the reduced time range. For example, model c has four structurally distinct intermediates in the entire time range and two intermediates in the reduced time range, which is in agreement with the results of the SVD analyses in the two time ranges. In contrast, models e–r are consistent only with the SVD analysis in the entire time range. For example, model e has four intermediates in the entire time range and three intermediates in the reduced time range, contradicting the result of the SVD analysis in the reduced time range. Then, using the four significant singular vectors obtained from the SVD analysis, we performed the kinetic analysis for each candidate kinetic model in order to determine the optimum kinetic model that best fits the experimental data. In the kinetic analysis, a theoretical time-resolved difference scattering curve (red curves in Figure 1) at each time delay was generated as a linear combination of four principal time-independent singular components in q space (that is, lSVs). The time evolution of the theoretical scattering curves can be described using a set of variable kinetic parameters based on a candidate kinetic model (for example, one of the kinetic models in Figure S6 in the SI). By minimizing the discrepancy (quantified by the χ2 value) between the experimental and the theoretical time-resolved difference scattering curves, we optimized the kinetic parameters of each candidate kinetic model. By comparing the minimized χ2 values (listed in Table S1 in the SI) of all of the candidate models, we determined the optimum kinetic model and extracted the species-associated difference scattering curves of the four intermediate species. Details of the kinetic analysis are described in section 4.2 of the SI. From the kinetic analysis, we found that model c shown in Figure 3a gives the smallest χ2 value among the 18 candidate models. In particular, after minimization of the χ2 value for each candidate kinetic model, only model c has nonzero contribution from the parallel pathway among models a–d that have a parallel pathway in the reduced time range (100 ps–3.16 ns), as can be seen in Figure S6 (SI). In other words, only model c is in agreement with the results of both SVD and kinetic analyses. Thus, we unambiguously determined that the most adequate model for describing the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whale MbCO is model c. In this model, the four intermediates are termed B, C, D, and S in the order of appearance in time. Notably, this kinetic model involves (1) the biphasic transition from the first intermediate (B) to the second one (C) and (2) the bimolecular nongeminate CO recombination of the last intermediate (S). On the basis of the results of the kinetic analysis, the first two relaxation components with time constants of 460 ps and 3.6 ns identified in the SVD analysis can be assigned to the biphasic transition between the B and C intermediates. The result of kinetic analysis using an optimum kinetic model. (a) The optimum kinetic model that best describes the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whale MbCO induced by CO photolysis. (b) Population changes of the four intermediates with respect to the pump–probe time delay. The lines correspond to the populations obtained from the kinetic analysis of the experimental data, and the symbols correspond to the optimized populations at the time delay points where experimental data were measured. To investigate the structural dynamics of Mb in detail, we examined the time-dependent population changes of the four intermediates as shown in Figure 3b. The first intermediate (B) is formed within 100 ps, which is the time resolution of our experiment. In previous studies on MbCO undergoing CO photolysis under physiological conditions using time-resolved IR spectroscopy, an intermediate corresponding to B was observed on the time scale of several picoseconds.[10,12] In particular, two different bands of CO stretching were distinguished spectroscopically and kinetically in the transient IR spectra.[10,12] These two bands were considered to arise from the change of the histidineCO interaction induced by two different orientations of photodissociated COs in the primary docking site, implying the existence of two conformational substates of the B intermediate.[9−12] It was interpreted that each substate of B originates from both A and A substates of the ground-state MbCO,[9−12] and the substates of B were denoted as B and B in the order of decreasing CO stretching frequency.[9−12] Then, we could infer that the B → C transition occurs biphasically because both B and B are involved in the tertiary structural relaxation associated with the B → C transition, which accompanies the movement of the photodissociated CO from the primary docking site to the Xe4 site.[3,21,22] According to an IR spectroscopic study by Nienhaus et al.,[11]B has a higher CO stretching frequency and thus exhibits a weaker histidineCO interaction than B. Therefore, the fast (460 ps) and slow (3.6 ns) relaxation components can be presumably assigned to B → C and B → C transitions, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 3b, the relative population ratio of these two transitions is 46/54%, with an error value of 2%. The biphasic transition from B to C has never been clearly resolved in previous studies using various spectroscopic tools,[9−12,23,24] even with time-resolved IR spectroscopy.[9−12] The lack of the biphasic transition in the time-resolved IR spectra suggests that the transition from B to C may involve both local and global structural changes of the protein because global structural changes are generally detectable only with direct structural tools.[5−7,16,17] Following the B → C transition, C transforms to the third intermediate (D) with a time constant of 92 ns, and D further proceeds to the last intermediate (S) with a time constant of 1.4 μs. The C → D and D → S transitions correspond to tertiary structural relaxations of Mb to its deoxy structure and accompany the movements of the photodissociated CO (1) from the Xe4 site to the Xe1 site and (2) from the Xe1 site to the solvent environment, respectively.[3] For C, D, and S, no biphasic kinetics were observed. This observation implies that those intermediates do not have any conformational substates governed by the histidineCO interaction, probably because of the escape of the photodissociated CO from the primary docking site.[3,21,22] Alternatively, if any conformational substates exist for the C, D, and S intermediates, the intrastate transitions among the substates of those intermediate states may occur much faster than the interstate transitions of C → D and D → S, resulting in single-exponential dynamics of the interstate transitions.[14] Finally, S (deoxy structure) returns to the structure of the ground-state MbCO (carbonmonoxy structure) via bimolecular nongeminate CO recombination with a rate of 230 ± 10 mM–1 s–1, which can be approximated by a combination of two unimolecular time constants of 90 μs and 1.2 ms.[17,19,20] Figure 4 summarizes the detailed scheme for the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whale MbCO, especially highlighting the movements of the CO.
Figure 4

Detailed scheme for the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whale MbCO. In particular, the movements of the CO molecule are highlighted. Yellow spheres indicate the locations of the CO for A, B, C, D, and S states. The CO ligated to the heme (A) is dissociated by the laser pulse centered at 532 nm. The photodissociated CO moves from the primary docking site (B) via the Xe4 site (C) to the Xe1 site (D) and finally to the solvent environment (S). The interplay between the distal histidine and the CO generates the conformational substates of A and B. In particular, due to the existence of the two conformational substates of B, the transition from B to C exhibits biphasic kinetics.

Detailed scheme for the photoreaction of wild-type sperm whale MbCO. In particular, the movements of the CO molecule are highlighted. Yellow spheres indicate the locations of the CO for A, B, C, D, and S states. The CO ligated to the heme (A) is dissociated by the laser pulse centered at 532 nm. The photodissociated CO moves from the primary docking site (B) via the Xe4 site (C) to the Xe1 site (D) and finally to the solvent environment (S). The interplay between the distal histidine and the CO generates the conformational substates of A and B. In particular, due to the existence of the two conformational substates of B, the transition from B to C exhibits biphasic kinetics. The present work can be compared with previous studies on MbCO performed using time-resolved X-ray solution scattering,[5−7] as summarized in Table S2 and detailed in section 5 of the SI. A study by Kim et al.[6] investigated structural dynamics of wild-type horse heart MbCO in the time range from 100 ps to 1 μs. In contrast, our present work investigates the structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whale MbCO in a wider time range (100 ps–10 ms) than in that ref (6). A work by Cho et al.[7] is equivalent to our present work in terms of the experimental technique, sample, time range, and number of time points. The key difference between ref (7) and our present work is that ref (7) used only a sequential kinetic model while our present work considered all of the plausible candidate models (based on the SVD analysis) in the kinetic analysis to determine the optimum kinetic model with much higher fidelity. In fact, the kinetic model employed in ref (7) is identical to one of the candidate models (model r in Figure S6 in the SI) examined in our present work, and all of the evidence presented in our present work demonstrates that model r is not an optimum model. In this work, we comprehensively elucidated the multistep structural dynamics of wild-type sperm whale MbCO induced by CO photolysis using picosecond X-ray solution scattering measured from 100 ps to 10 ms after photolysis. In particular, by combining the results of the SVD and kinetic analyses for a total of 18 candidate models, we established the most adequate kinetic model. This optimum model includes a biphasic transition from the first intermediate to the second one (B → C) and bimolecular nongeminate CO recombination. Our approach of combining picosecond X-ray solution scattering, SVD analysis in variable time ranges, and subsequent kinetic analysis provides a convenient tool for determining the optimum kinetic model with high fidelity and can be further applied to other systems.

Methods

Picosecond X-ray solution scattering data were acquired using the pump–probe method at the BioCARS 14-ID-B beamline at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) while the storage ring was operated in the standard top-up mode. Aqueous solution samples of wild-type sperm whale MbCO were prepared at a 8 mM concentration in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 using a previously established protocol. Photodissociation of MbCO was initiated by exciting the MbCO solution contained in a capillary of 1 mm thickness with a 35 ps long laser pulse at 532 nm. Subsequently, a ∼100 ps long X-ray pulse probed the sample, and the scattered X-ray photons were recorded as a function of the time delay between the laser pump pulse and the X-ray probe pulse. Time-resolved scattering curves were collected at 33 pump–probe time delays in the range from 100 ps to 10 ms (four time points per decade). Taking the difference between the scattering curve measured at each time delay point and the reference scattering curve measured at −5 μs yielded the difference scattering curve, ΔS(q,t). The contribution from laser-induced solvent heating was removed from the measured scattering curves. The details of the experiment and the data processing are provided in the SI.
  22 in total

1.  Picosecond phase grating spectroscopy of hemoglobin and myoglobin: energetics and dynamics of global protein motion.

Authors:  L Richard; L Genberg; J Deak; H L Chiu; R J Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Protein conformational relaxation following photodissociation of CO from carbonmonoxymyoglobin: picosecond circular dichroism and absorption studies.

Authors:  X L Xie; J D Simon
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-04-16       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mapping hydration dynamics around a protein surface.

Authors:  Luyuan Zhang; Lijuan Wang; Ya-Ting Kao; Weihong Qiu; Yi Yang; Oghaghare Okobiah; Dongping Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Direct observation of fast protein conformational switching.

Authors:  Haruto Ishikawa; Kyungwon Kwak; Jean K Chung; Seongheun Kim; Michael D Fayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ligand binding to heme proteins. VI. Interconversion of taxonomic substates in carbonmonoxymyoglobin.

Authors:  J B Johnson; D C Lamb; H Frauenfelder; J D Müller; B McMahon; G U Nienhaus; R D Young
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Ultrafast rotation and trapping of carbon monoxide dissociated from myoglobin.

Authors:  M Lim; T A Jackson; P A Anfinrud
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-03

8.  Conformational relaxation and ligand binding in myoglobin.

Authors:  A Ansari; C M Jones; E R Henry; J Hofrichter; W A Eaton
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-03       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Cavities in proteins: structure of a metmyoglobin-xenon complex solved to 1.9 A.

Authors:  R F Tilton; I D Kuntz; G A Petsko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1984-06-19       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Ligand migration and cavities within Scapharca Dimeric HbI: studies by time-resolved crystallo-graphy, Xe binding, and computational analysis.

Authors:  James E Knapp; Reinhard Pahl; Jordi Cohen; Jeffry C Nichols; Klaus Schulten; Quentin H Gibson; Vukica Srajer; William E Royer
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  10 in total

1.  NO binding kinetics in myoglobin investigated by picosecond Fe K-edge absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mahsa Silatani; Frederico A Lima; Thomas J Penfold; Jochen Rittmann; Marco E Reinhard; Hannelore M Rittmann-Frank; Camelia Borca; Daniel Grolimund; Christopher J Milne; Majed Chergui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Full kinetics of CO entry, internal diffusion, and exit in myoglobin from transition-path theory simulations.

Authors:  Tang-Qing Yu; Mauro Lapelosa; Eric Vanden-Eijnden; Cameron F Abrams
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Insulin hexamer dissociation dynamics revealed by photoinduced T-jumps and time-resolved X-ray solution scattering.

Authors:  Dolev Rimmerman; Denis Leshchev; Darren J Hsu; Jiyun Hong; Baxter Abraham; Irina Kosheleva; Robert Henning; Lin X Chen
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Combined probes of X-ray scattering and optical spectroscopy reveal how global conformational change is temporally and spatially linked to local structural perturbation in photoactive yellow protein.

Authors:  Tae Wu Kim; Cheolhee Yang; Youngmin Kim; Jong Goo Kim; Jeongho Kim; Yang Ouk Jung; Sunhong Jun; Sang Jin Lee; Sungjun Park; Irina Kosheleva; Robert Henning; Jasper J van Thor; Hyotcherl Ihee
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Sub-100-ps structural dynamics of horse heart myoglobin probed by time-resolved X-ray solution scattering.

Authors:  Key Young Oang; Kyung Hwan Kim; Junbeom Jo; Youngmin Kim; Jong Goo Kim; Tae Wu Kim; Sunhong Jun; Jeongho Kim; Hyotcherl Ihee
Journal:  Chem Phys       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.348

Review 6.  Reaction dynamics studied via femtosecond X-ray liquidography at X-ray free-electron lasers.

Authors:  Eun Hyuk Choi; Yunbeom Lee; Jun Heo; Hyotcherl Ihee
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 9.969

7.  Direct Observation of Insulin Association Dynamics with Time-Resolved X-ray Scattering.

Authors:  Dolev Rimmerman; Denis Leshchev; Darren J Hsu; Jiyun Hong; Irina Kosheleva; Lin X Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.475

8.  Ultrafast myoglobin structural dynamics observed with an X-ray free-electron laser.

Authors:  Matteo Levantino; Giorgio Schirò; Henrik Till Lemke; Grazia Cottone; James Michael Glownia; Diling Zhu; Mathieu Chollet; Hyotcherl Ihee; Antonio Cupane; Marco Cammarata
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  SVD-aided pseudo principal-component analysis: A new method to speed up and improve determination of the optimum kinetic model from time-resolved data.

Authors:  Key Young Oang; Cheolhee Yang; Srinivasan Muniyappan; Jeongho Kim; Hyotcherl Ihee
Journal:  Struct Dyn       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 10.  Protein Structural Dynamics of Wild-Type and Mutant Homodimeric Hemoglobin Studied by Time-Resolved X-Ray Solution Scattering.

Authors:  Cheolhee Yang; Minseo Choi; Jong Goo Kim; Hanui Kim; Srinivasan Muniyappan; Shunsuke Nozawa; Shin-Ichi Adachi; Robert Henning; Irina Kosheleva; Hyotcherl Ihee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.