Literature DB >> 24748074

Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Andrei G Pakhomov1, Iurii Semenov, Shu Xiao, Olga N Pakhomova, Betsy Gregory, Karl H Schoenbach, Jody C Ullery, Hope T Beier, Sambasiva R Rajulapati, Bennett L Ibey.   

Abstract

Nanoelectroporation of biomembranes is an effect of high-voltage, nanosecond-duration electric pulses (nsEP). It occurs both in the plasma membrane and inside the cell, and nanoporated membranes are distinguished by ion-selective and potential-sensitive permeability. Here we report a novel phenomenon of bioeffects cancellation that puts nsEP cardinally apart from the conventional electroporation and electrostimulation by milli- and microsecond pulses. We compared the effects of 60- and 300-ns monopolar, nearly rectangular nsEP on intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization and cell survival with those of bipolar 60 + 60 and 300 + 300 ns pulses. For diverse endpoints, exposure conditions, pulse numbers (1-60), and amplitudes (15-60 kV/cm), the addition of the second phase cancelled the effects of the first phase. The overall effect of bipolar pulses was profoundly reduced, despite delivering twofold more energy. Cancellation also took place when two phases were separated into two independent nsEP of opposite polarities; it gradually tapered out as the interval between two nsEP increased, but was still present even at a 10-µs interval. The phenomenon of cancellation is unique for nsEP and has not been predicted by the equivalent circuit, transport lattice, and molecular dynamics models of electroporation. The existing paradigms of membrane permeabilization by nsEP will need to be modified. Here we discuss the possible involvement of the assisted membrane discharge, two-step oxidation of membrane phospholipids, and reverse transmembrane ion transport mechanisms. Cancellation impacts nsEP applications in cancer therapy, electrostimulation, and biotechnology, and provides new insights into effects of more complex waveforms, including pulsed electromagnetic emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748074      PMCID: PMC4205218          DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1626-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  56 in total

1.  Stimulation of capacitative calcium entry in HL-60 cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Jody A White; Peter F Blackmore; Karl H Schoenbach; Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Electroporation by using bipolar oscillating electric field: an improved method for DNA transfection of NIH 3T3 cells.

Authors:  E Tekle; R D Astumian; P B Chock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nanosecond electric pulses cause mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in Jurkat cells.

Authors:  Tina Batista Napotnik; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Martin A Gundersen; Damijan Miklavčič; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Electroporation of cardiac cell membranes with monophasic or biphasic rectangular pulses.

Authors:  O Tovar; L Tung
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination.

Authors:  T Kotnik; D Miklavcic; L M Mir
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.373

8.  Hemolysis of human erythrocytes by transient electric field.

Authors:  K Kinosita; T T Tsong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Electroporating fields target oxidatively damaged areas in the cell membrane.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Zachary A Levine; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Vanessa Joubert; Matthew J Ziegler; Lluis M Mir; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Sergey Grigoryev; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandra Paffi; Micaela Liberti; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Modeling of Transmembrane Potential in Realistic Multicellular Structures before Electroporation.

Authors:  Tomo Murovec; Daniel C Sweeney; Eduardo Latouche; Rafael V Davalos; Christian Brosseau
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

5.  Dye Transport through Bilayers Agrees with Lipid Electropore Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Sourav Haldar; Paul S Blank; Federica Castellani; P Thomas Vernier; Joshua Zimmerberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalii Kim; Christian Zemlin; Esin Sozer; Claudia Muratori; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Christian Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-22

9.  Neuronal excitation and permeabilization by 200-ns pulsed electric field: An optical membrane potential study with FluoVolt dye.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.747

10.  Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.