Literature DB >> 1721194

Electroporation of cardiac cell membranes with monophasic or biphasic rectangular pulses.

O Tovar1, L Tung.   

Abstract

During defibrillation, cardioversion, and electrocution trauma, heart cells are exposed to potential gradients that increase the transmembrane potential (Vm). At sufficiently high Vm, pathological increases in cell permeability can occur. With enzymatically isolated frog heart cells (n = 29) we investigated the voltage and time sufficient for electroporation or cardiac cell membranes with rectangular voltage pulses, particularly with 5-msec monophasic, and 5- or 10-msec biphasic pulses. The rectangular voltage pulse (monophasic 0.1-1.5 V, 0.1-100 msec or symmetric biphasic 0.1-1 V, 0.4-10 msec [total duration]) was applied to the cell membrane using the cell-attached patch clamp technique, and a low voltage pulse train was added so that membrane conductance could be monitored continuously. Step increases in membrane conductance (breakdown) were observed, indicative of electroporation, and occurred with different combinations of pulse amplitude and duration; for example, for monophasic square pulses: (1 V, 0.2 msec) or (0.5 V, 0.5 msec), and for biphasic pulses: (1 V, 0.4 msec total duration) or (0.5 V, 0.8 msec). Using 5- or 10-msec rectangular pulses, breakdown occurred at a voltage around 0.4 V independent of polarity or waveform. The recovery of the permeabilized cell membrane after the voltage pulse was highly variable, in some cases not recovering at all while in other cases recovering after a lapse of seconds to minutes. These results suggest that monophasic and biphasic pulses of approximately 1 V, 0.2-0.4 msec and approximately 0.4 V, 5 msec can permeabilize the heart cell membrane even for minutes, time enough to cause an alteration in the cellular ionic composition leading to depressed or unexcitable tissue, a precursor for cardiac arrhythmia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1721194     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02785.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  16 in total

1.  Radio frequency perforation of cardiac tissue: modelling and experimental results.

Authors:  N Shimko; P Savard; K Shah
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Generation of focused electric field patterns at dielectric surfaces.

Authors:  Jessica Olofsson; Mikael Levin; Anette Strömberg; Stephen G Weber; Frida Ryttsén; Owe Orwar
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Numerical calculations of single-cell electroporation with an electrolyte-filled capillary.

Authors:  Imants Zudans; Aparna Agarwal; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Sergey Grigoryev; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.373

6.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Irreversible electroporation near the heart: ventricular arrhythmias can be prevented with ECG synchronization.

Authors:  Ajita Deodhar; Timm Dickfeld; Gordon W Single; William C Hamilton; Raymond H Thornton; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Majid Maybody; Mithat Gónen; Boris Rubinsky; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Monoclonal Cell Line Generation and CRISPR/Cas9 Manipulation via Single-Cell Electroporation.

Authors:  Ruiguo Yang; Vincent Lemaître; Changjin Huang; Abbas Haddadi; Rebecca McNaughton; Horacio D Espinosa
Journal:  Small       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].

Authors:  M Block; D Hammel; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.