Literature DB >> 11506979

Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination.

T Kotnik1, D Miklavcic, L M Mir.   

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative study of the contamination of a cell suspension by ions released from aluminum cuvettes (Al(3+)) and stainless steel electrodes (Fe(2+)/Fe(3+)) during cell membrane electropermeabilization by unipolar and by symmetrical bipolar rectangular electric pulses. A single pulse and a train of eight pulses were delivered to electrodes at a 2-mm distance, with 100-micros and 1-ms pulse durations, and amplitudes ranging from 0 to 400 V for unipolar, and from 0 to 280 V for bipolar pulses. We found that the released concentrations of Al(3+) and Fe(2+)/Fe(3+) were always more than one order of magnitude lower with bipolar pulses than with unipolar pulses of the same amplitude and duration. We then investigated the viability of DC-3F cells after 1 h of incubation in the medium containing different concentrations of Al(3+) or Fe(2+)/Fe(3+) within the range of measured released concentrations (up to 2.5 mM for both ions), thus separating the effects of electrolytic contamination from the effects of electropermeabilization itself. For Fe(2+)/Fe(3+), loss of cell viability became significant at concentrations above 1.5 mM, while for Al(3+), no effect on cell survival was detected within the investigated range. Still, reports on the biochemical effects of released Al(3+) also suggest that with aluminum cuvettes, electrolytic contamination can be detrimental. Our study shows that electrolytic contamination and its detrimental effects can be largely reduced with no loss in efficiency of electropermeabilization, if bipolar rectangular pulses of the same amplitude and duration are used instead of the commonly applied unipolar pulses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11506979     DOI: 10.1016/s1567-5394(01)00115-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  18 in total

1.  Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields.

Authors:  Tadej Kotnik; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Simultaneous maximization of cell permeabilization and viability in single-cell electroporation using an electrolyte-filled capillary.

Authors:  Aparna Agarwal; Imants Zudans; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  In situ bipolar electroporation for localized cell loading with reporter dyes and investigating gap junctional coupling.

Authors:  Elke De Vuyst; Marijke De Bock; Elke Decrock; Marijke Van Moorhem; Christian Naus; Cyriel Mabilde; Luc Leybaert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Sergey Grigoryev; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.373

5.  Inactivation of Pseudomonas putida by pulsed electric field treatment: a study on the correlation of treatment parameters and inactivation efficiency in the short-pulse range.

Authors:  Wolfgang Frey; Christian Gusbeth; Thomas Schwartz
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  The Effect of Lipid Antioxidant α-Tocopherol on Cell Viability and Electrofusion Yield of B16-F1 Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Masa Kanduser; Mojca Kokalj Imsirovic; Marko Usaj
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Scaling relationship and optimization of double-pulse electroporation.

Authors:  Mohamed M Sadik; Miao Yu; Mingde Zheng; Jeffrey D Zahn; Jerry W Shan; David I Shreiber; Hao Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.373

10.  High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) for non-thermal ablation without muscle contraction.

Authors:  Christopher B Arena; Michael B Sano; John H Rossmeisl; John L Caldwell; Paulo A Garcia; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.