Literature DB >> 28432032

Neuronal excitation and permeabilization by 200-ns pulsed electric field: An optical membrane potential study with FluoVolt dye.

Andrei G Pakhomov1, Iurii Semenov2, Maura Casciola2, Shu Xiao3.   

Abstract

Electric field pulses of nano- and picosecond duration are a novel modality for neurostimulation, activation of Ca2+ signaling, and tissue ablation. However it is not known how such brief pulses activate voltage-gated ion channels. We studied excitation and electroporation of hippocampal neurons by 200-ns pulsed electric field (nsPEF), by means of time-lapse imaging of the optical membrane potential (OMP) with FluoVolt dye. Electroporation abruptly shifted OMP to a more depolarized level, which was reached within <1ms. The OMP recovery started rapidly (τ=8-12ms) but gradually slowed down (to τ>10s), so cells remained above the resting OMP level for at least 20-30s. Activation of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) enhanced the depolarizing effect of electroporation, resulting in an additional tetrodotoxin-sensitive OMP peak in 4-5ms after nsPEF. Omitting Ca2+ in the extracellular solution did not reduce the depolarization, suggesting no contribution of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC). In 40% of neurons, nsPEF triggered a single action potential (AP), with the median threshold of 3kV/cm (range: 1.9-4kV/cm); no APs could be evoked by stimuli below the electroporation threshold (1.5-1.9kV/cm). VGSC opening could already be detected in 0.5ms after nsPEF, which is too fast to be mediated by the depolarizing effect of electroporation. The overlap of electroporation and AP thresholds does not necessarily reflect the causal relation, but suggests a low potency of nsPEF, as compared to conventional electrostimulation, for VGSC activation and AP induction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electropermeabilization; Electroporation; Excitation; Membrane permeability; Nanopores; Nanosecond pulses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432032      PMCID: PMC5484080          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr        ISSN: 0005-2736            Impact factor:   3.747


  45 in total

1.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

2.  Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Juergen F Kolb; Jody A White; Ravindra P Joshi; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Molecular dynamics simulations of ion conductance in field-stabilized nanoscale lipid electropores.

Authors:  Ming-Chak Ho; Maura Casciola; Zachary A Levine; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments.

Authors:  Marie Breton; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Frequency-dependent interaction of ultrashort E-fields with nociceptor membranes and proteins.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Brian Y Cooper
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.010

6.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

7.  A molecular insight into the electro-transfer of small molecules through electropores driven by electric fields.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Mounir Tarek
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-03-24

8.  Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Nanoelectroablation of human pancreatic carcinoma in a murine xenograft model without recurrence.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Joanne Huynh; Kaying Lui; Ryan Wood; Mark Kreis; Brian Athos; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandra Paffi; Micaela Liberti; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jan E Azarov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17

4.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalii Kim; Christian Zemlin; Esin Sozer; Claudia Muratori; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?

Authors:  A R Ruiz-Fernández; M Rosemblatt; T Perez-Acle
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

6.  Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Bennet L Ibey; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.373

7.  Activation of the phospholipid scramblase TMEM16F by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) facilitates its diverse cytophysiological effects.

Authors:  Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; Jade Meads; Maura Casciola; Peter A Mollica; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Damage-free peripheral nerve stimulation by 12-ns pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Sergey Grigoryev; Johanna U Neuber; Christian W Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Transport of charged small molecules after electropermeabilization - drift and diffusion.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; C Florencia Pocetti; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  BMC Biophys       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.