Literature DB >> 31472962

Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Andrei G Pakhomov1, Shu Xiao2, Vitalij Novickij3, Maura Casciola4, Iurii Semenov4, Uma Mangalanathan4, Vitalii Kim4, Christian Zemlin2, Esin Sozer4, Claudia Muratori4, Olga N Pakhomova4.   

Abstract

Intense nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) is a novel modality for cell activation and nanoelectroporation. Applications of nsPEF in research and therapy are hindered by a high electric field requirement, typically from 1 to over 50 kV/cm to elicit any bioeffects. We show how this requirement can be overcome by engaging temporal summation when pulses are compressed into high-rate bursts (up to several MHz). This approach was tested for excitation of ventricular cardiomyocytes and peripheral nerve fibers; for membrane electroporation of cardiomyocytes, CHO, and HEK cells; and for killing EL-4 cells. MHz compression of nsPEF bursts (100-1000 pulses) enables excitation at only 0.01-0.15 kV/cm and electroporation already at 0.4-0.6 kV/cm. Clear separation of excitation and electroporation thresholds allows for multiple excitation cycles without membrane disruption. The efficiency of nsPEF bursts increases with the duty cycle (by increasing either pulse duration or repetition rate) and with increasing the total time "on" (by increasing either pulse duration or number). For some endpoints, the efficiency of nsPEF bursts matches a single "long" pulse whose amplitude and duration equal the time-average amplitude and duration of the bursts. For other endpoints this rule is not valid, presumably because of nsPEF-specific bioeffects and/or possible modification of targets already during the burst. MHz compression of nsPEF bursts is a universal and efficient way to lower excitation thresholds and facilitate electroporation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electropermeabilization; Electroporation; Electrostimulation; Nanosecond pulses; Temporal summation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472962      PMCID: PMC6758562          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  30 in total

1.  Mechanisms for the intracellular manipulation of organelles by conventional electroporation.

Authors:  Axel T Esser; Kyle C Smith; T R Gowrishankar; Zlatko Vasilkoski; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by trains of ultrashort electric pulses.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Dustin G Mixon; Jason A Payne; Angela Bowman; Karl Sickendick; Gerald J Wilmink; W Patrick Roach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Modulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in chromaffin cells by nanoelectropulses.

Authors:  Gale L Craviso; Sophie Choe; Indira Chatterjee; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.373

4.  Cardiac myocyte excitation by ultrashort high-field pulses.

Authors:  Sufen Wang; Jiexiao Chen; Meng-Tse Chen; P Thomas Vernier; Martin A Gundersen; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Recruitment of the intracellular Ca2+ by ultrashort electric stimuli: the impact of pulse duration.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 6.817

6.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Angela M Bowman; Bennett L Ibey; Franck M Andre; Olga N Pakhomova; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach; Michael R Murphy; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  THE APPARENT DISTORTION OF BRIEF RECTANGULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULI IN NERVE.

Authors:  H A Blair
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1937-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Two modes of cell death caused by exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Iurii Semenov; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.373

Review 2.  Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-12-12

3.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?

Authors:  A R Ruiz-Fernández; M Rosemblatt; T Perez-Acle
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

Review 4.  Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF): Opening the Biotechnological Pandora's Box.

Authors:  Alvaro R Ruiz-Fernández; Leonardo Campos; Sebastian E Gutierrez-Maldonado; Gonzalo Núñez; Felipe Villanelo; Tomas Perez-Acle
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Probing Nanoelectroporation and Resealing of the Cell Membrane by the Entry of Ca2+ and Ba2+ Ions.

Authors:  Wenfei Bo; Mantas Silkunas; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Does the shape of the electric pulse matter in electroporation?

Authors:  Vitalij Novickij; Nina Rembiałkowska; Wojciech Szlasa; Julita Kulbacka
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Effects of high-frequency nanosecond pulses on prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Aleksander Kiełbik; Wojciech Szlasa; Vitalij Novickij; Anna Szewczyk; Magdalena Maciejewska; Jolanta Saczko; Julita Kulbacka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Exploring the Conformational Changes Induced by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields on the Voltage Sensing Domain of a Ca2+ Channel.

Authors:  Alvaro R Ruiz-Fernández; Leonardo Campos; Felipe Villanelo; Sebastian E Gutiérrez-Maldonado; Tomas Perez-Acle
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26

9.  Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation.

Authors:  Emily Gudvangen; Vitalii Kim; Vitalij Novickij; Federico Battista; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.