Literature DB >> 29627664

The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Andrei G Pakhomov1, Sergey Grigoryev2, Iurii Semenov2, Maura Casciola2, Chunqi Jiang3, Shu Xiao3.   

Abstract

Bipolar cancellation refers to a phenomenon when applying a second electric pulse reduces ("cancels") cell membrane damage by a preceding electric pulse of the opposite polarity. Bipolar cancellation is a reason why bipolar nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) cause weaker electroporation than just a single unipolar phase of the same pulse. This study was undertaken to explore the dependence of bipolar cancellation on nsEP parameters, with emphasis on the amplitude ratio of two opposite polarity phases of a bipolar pulse. Individual cells (CHO, U937, or adult mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes (VCM)) were exposed to either uni- or bipolar trapezoidal nsEP, or to nanosecond electric field oscillations (NEFO). The membrane injury was evaluated by time-lapse confocal imaging of the uptake of propidium (Pr) or YO-PRO-1 (YP) dyes and by phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Within studied limits, bipolar cancellation showed little or no dependence on the electric field intensity, pulse repetition rate, chosen endpoint, or cell type. However, cancellation could increase for larger pulse numbers and/or for longer pulses. The sole most critical parameter which determines bipolar cancellation was the phase ratio: maximum cancellation was observed with the 2nd phase of about 50% of the first one, whereas a larger 2nd phase could add a damaging effect of its own. "Swapping" the two phases, i.e., delivering the smaller phase before the larger one, reduced or eliminated cancellation. These findings are discussed in the context of hypothetical mechanisms of bipolar cancellation and electroporation by nsEP.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar cancellation; Electropermeabilization; Electroporation; Membrane permeability; Nanopores; Nanosecond pulses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627664      PMCID: PMC5984177          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  29 in total

1.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Cheryl M Craft; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Effect of electric field vectoriality on electrically mediated gene delivery in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Cécile Faurie; Emilie Phez; Muriel Golzio; Christine Vossen; Jeanne-Claire Lesbordes; Christine Delteil; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-10-11

3.  Electro-mediated gene transfer and expression are controlled by the life-time of DNA/membrane complex formation.

Authors:  Cécile Faurie; Matej Rebersek; Muriel Golzio; Masa Kanduser; Jean-Michel Escoffre; Mojca Pavlin; Justin Teissie; Damijan Miklavcic; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.565

Review 4.  Methods in cardiomyocyte isolation, culture, and gene transfer.

Authors:  William E Louch; Katherine A Sheehan; Beata M Wolska
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 5.000

5.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

6.  Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Electroporation-induced electrosensitization.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facilitation of electroporative drug uptake and cell killing by electrosensitization.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Jimo Lee; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao; Bennet L Ibey; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandra Paffi; Micaela Liberti; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jan E Azarov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17

3.  Dye Transport through Bilayers Agrees with Lipid Electropore Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Sourav Haldar; Paul S Blank; Federica Castellani; P Thomas Vernier; Joshua Zimmerberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalii Kim; Christian Zemlin; Esin Sozer; Claudia Muratori; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-12-12

6.  Real-Time Impedance Monitoring During Electroporation Processes in Vegetal Tissue Using a High-Performance Generator.

Authors:  Borja López-Alonso; Hector Sarnago; Oscar Lucía; Pablo Briz; José Miguel Burdío
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Maura Casciola; Carol Zhou; Enbo Yang; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  2-ns Electrostimulation of Ca2+ Influx into Chromaffin Cells: Rapid Modulation by Field Reversal.

Authors:  Josette Zaklit; Gale L Craviso; Normand Leblanc; P Thomas Vernier; Esin B Sözer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Paradoxical effects on voltage-gated Na+ conductance in adrenal chromaffin cells by twin vs single high intensity nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Lisha Yang; Sophia Pierce; Indira Chatterjee; Gale L Craviso; Normand Leblanc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Elise P W Jenkins; Alina Finch; Magda Gerigk; Iasonas F Triantis; Colin Watts; George G Malliaras
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.