Literature DB >> 27986976

Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Elena C Gianulis1, Chantelle Labib2, Gintautas Saulis3, Vitalij Novickij4, Olga N Pakhomova2, Andrei G Pakhomov2.   

Abstract

Tumor ablation by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) is an emerging therapeutic modality. We compared nsPEF cytotoxicity for human cell lines of cancerous (IMR-32, Hep G2, HT-1080, and HPAF-II) and non-cancerous origin (BJ and MRC-5) under strictly controlled and identical conditions. Adherent cells were uniformly treated by 300-ns PEF (0-2000 pulses, 1.8 kV/cm, 50 Hz) on indium tin oxide-covered glass coverslips, using the same media and serum. Cell survival plotted against the number of pulses displayed three distinct regions (initial resistivity, logarithmic survival decline, and residual resistivity) for all tested cell types, but with differences in LD50 spanning as much as nearly 80-fold. The non-cancerous cells were less sensitive than IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells but more vulnerable than the other cancers tested. The cytotoxic efficiency showed no apparent correlation with cell or nuclear size, cell morphology, metabolism level, or the extent of membrane disruption by nsPEF. Increasing pulse duration to 9 µs (0.75 kV/cm, 5 Hz) produced a different selectivity pattern, suggesting that manipulation of PEF parameters can, at least for certain cancers, overcome their resistance to nsPEF ablation. Identifying mechanisms and cell markers of differential nsPEF susceptibility will critically contribute to the proper choice and outcome of nsPEF ablation therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer ablation; Cytotoxicity; Electroporation; Microsecond electric pulses; Nanosecond electric pulses

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27986976      PMCID: PMC7024567          DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2434-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  74 in total

1.  Electropermeabilization of cell membranes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Effect of cell size and shape on single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  Aparna Agarwal; Imants Zudans; Emily A Weber; Jessica Olofsson; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Elevated levels of cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in cancer cells are correlated with apoptosis sensitivity induced by cholesterol-depleting agents.

Authors:  Ying Chun Li; Mi Jung Park; Sang-Kyu Ye; Chul-Woo Kim; Yong-Nyun Kim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Permeabilization of the nuclear envelope following nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure.

Authors:  Gary L Thompson; Caleb C Roth; Marjorie A Kuipers; Gleb P Tolstykh; Hope T Beier; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Lipidomic analysis of phospholipids from human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  M Luísa Dória; Cândida Z Cotrim; Cláudia Simões; Bárbara Macedo; Pedro Domingues; M Rosário Domingues; Luisa A Helguero
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 6.  Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in the clinical setting: a systematic review of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Hester J Scheffer; Karin Nielsen; Marcus C de Jong; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Jenny M Vieveen; Arthur R A Bouwman; Sybren Meijer; Cornelis van Kuijk; Petrousjka M P van den Tol; Martijn R Meijerink
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Hormone sensitivity is reflected in the phospholipid profiles of breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Marina Sterin; Jack S Cohen; Israel Ringel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation and a case report of intense nanosecond pulsed electric field as a local therapy for human malignancies.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; David Sawcer; P Thomas Vernier; Tao Tang; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Martin A Gundersen; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Differential effects in cells exposed to ultra-short, high intensity electric fields: cell survival, DNA damage, and cell cycle analysis.

Authors:  M Stacey; J Stickley; P Fox; V Statler; K Schoenbach; S J Beebe; S Buescher
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Electrosensitization assists cell ablation by nanosecond pulsed electric field in 3D cultures.

Authors:  Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  18 in total

1.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalii Kim; Christian Zemlin; Esin Sozer; Claudia Muratori; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Activation of the phospholipid scramblase TMEM16F by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) facilitates its diverse cytophysiological effects.

Authors:  Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; Jade Meads; Maura Casciola; Peter A Mollica; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Damage-free peripheral nerve stimulation by 12-ns pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Activation of Anti-tumor Immune Response by Ablation of HCC with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field.

Authors:  Xiaobo Xu; Yiling Chen; Ruiqing Zhang; Xudong Miao; Xinhua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-27

5.  Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Sergey Grigoryev; Johanna U Neuber; Christian W Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Multi-Parametric Study of the Viability of in Vitro Skin Cancer Cells Exposed to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Combined With Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.

Authors:  Yan Mi; Pan Li; Quan Liu; Jin Xu; Qiyu Yang; Junying Tang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

7.  Nanosecond pulsed electric fields enhance mesenchymal stem cells differentiation via DNMT1-regulated OCT4/NANOG gene expression.

Authors:  Kejia Li; Tong Ning; Hao Wang; Yangzi Jiang; Jue Zhang; Zigang Ge
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Dual-function of Baicalin in nsPEFs-treated Hepatocytes and Hepatocellular Carcinoma cells for Different Death Pathway and Mitochondrial Response.

Authors:  Yubo Wang; Shengyong Yin; Yuan Zhou; Wuhua Zhou; Tianchi Chen; Qinchuan Wu; Lin Zhou; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Antitumor Response and Immunomodulatory Effects of Sub-Microsecond Irreversible Electroporation and Its Combination with Calcium Electroporation.

Authors:  Vitalij Novickij; Robertas Čėsna; Emilija Perminaitė; Auksė Zinkevičienė; Dainius Characiejus; Jurij Novickij; Saulius Šatkauskas; Paulius Ruzgys; Irutė Girkontaitė
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Induce Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Accompanied by Immunogenic Cell Death in Murine Models of Lymphoma and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Rossi; Olga N Pakhomova; Peter A Mollica; Maura Casciola; Uma Mangalanathan; Andrei G Pakhomov; Claudia Muratori
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.