Literature DB >> 24633376

[Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

U Hoppe1, A Hast, T Hocke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Speech perception is the most important social task of the auditory system. Consequently, speech audiometry is essential to evaluate hearing aid benefit. The aim of the study was to describe the correlation between pure-tone hearing loss and speech perception. In particular, pure-tone audiogram, speech audiogram, and speech perception with hearing aids were compared.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 102 hearing aid users with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included. Pure-tone loss (PTA) was correlated to monosyllabic perception at 65 dB with hearing aid and with maximum monosyllabic perception with headphones.
RESULTS: Speech perception as a function of hearing loss can be represented by a sigmoid function. However, for higher degrees of hearing loss, substantial deviations are observed. Maximum monosyllabic perception with headphones is usually not achieved with hearing aids at standard speech levels of 65 dB.
CONCLUSION: For larger groups, average pure-tone hearing loss and speech perception correlate significantly. However, prognosis for individuals is not possible. In particular for higher degrees of hearing loss substantial deviations could be observed. Speech performance with hearing aids cannot be predicted sufficiently from speech audiograms. Above the age of 80, speech perception is significantly worse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633376     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-013-2813-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  14 in total

1.  [Modern speech tests on their way from research into practice : Expectations and reality].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; T Kortmann; U Hoppe; H Hessel; A Morsnowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 4.  [Audiologic rehabilitation of patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Hoth; J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model.

Authors:  Tim Jürgens; Thomas Brand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Central presbyacusis: a longitudinal case study.

Authors:  B A Stach; J F Jerger; K A Fleming
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  [Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation: audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes].

Authors:  S Arndt; R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; F Hassepass; G Ihorst; S Kroeger; P Kirchem; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  [Long term results after cochlear implantation in elderly patients].

Authors:  M Herzog; F Schön; J Müller; C Knaus; L Scholtz; J Helms
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 10.  [The tasks of the ENT specialist by hearing aid fitting. Part 2: checking the fit, subjective satisfaction, ear mold and hearing aid].

Authors:  K Schorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  15 in total

1.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 4.  [Cochlear implant fitting strategies].

Authors:  U Hoppe; T Liebscher; J Hornung
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].

Authors:  R Thümmler; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].

Authors:  U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].

Authors:  C Dörfler; T Hocke; A Hast; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels. German version].

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.