Literature DB >> 25231698

[Development and use of an APHAB database].

J Löhler1, B Akcicek, T Kappe, P Schlattmann, B Wollenberg, R Schönweiler.   

Abstract

A specific quality assurance questionnaire concerned with the provision of hearing aids was introduced that assesses elements of patient satisfaction within Germany's statutory healthcare system. A questionnaire-based assessment is now relevant for all physicians involved in the care of statutorily insured patients in Germany. The APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) questionnaire is the most widely used. The APHAB assesses several different situations: the normal hearing situation, hearing in noise, comprehension of speech in situations of echo or reverberation and hearing in loud situations. The APHAB questionnaire-based patient evaluation of the benefit of hearing aids represents the third pillar of audiological diagnostics, alongside classical pure-tone and speech audiometry. The objective of the APHAB database is to allow evaluation of individual patient data on the basis of a larger volume of data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231698     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2915-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  16 in total

1.  Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Ginger A Gray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1999-11

4.  Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  Melinda C Freyaldenhoven; Anna K Nabelek; Joanna W Tampas
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  [Assessment inventories for hearing aid outcome].

Authors:  S Miller; D Kühn; M Ptok
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  [Effect of frequency compression in hearing aids on speech intelligibility and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  M Leifholz; S Margolf-Hackl; S Kreikemeier; J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].

Authors:  J Löhler; L Moser; D Heinrich; K Hörmann; L E Walther
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  [The tasks of the ENT specialist by hearing aid fitting. Part 2: checking the fit, subjective satisfaction, ear mold and hearing aid].

Authors:  K Schorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].

Authors:  R Thümmler; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Dependency of APHAB score in the ECu subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].

Authors:  J Löhler; O Wegner; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Hearing aid fitting: Effect of doubling the standard rate on compliance, quality of results, and excess payments].

Authors:  B Braun; A Dietrich; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).

Authors:  Jan Löhler; F Gräbner; B Wollenberg; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores.

Authors:  J Löhler; B Wollenberg; P Schlattmann; N Hoang; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].

Authors:  Jan Löhler; Mathias Sippel; Leif Erik Walther; Rainer Schönweiler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.057

10.  [Possibilities to predict the success of an individual hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].

Authors:  Max Thomas; Rainer Schönweiler; Jan Löhler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.