Literature DB >> 27299893

[Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].

U Hoppe1.   

Abstract

The benefit of hearing aids is not always directly subjectively perceivable. Therefore, objective and quantifiable speech audiometric measurements are required. Beside acoustic gain measurements and structured interviews, speech audiometry in quiet and in noise is one of the three pillars of hearing aid evaluation.The Freiburg monosyllabic test has been used for decades for hearing aid prescription and evaluation in German speaking countries. Relative and absolute targets can be individually defined for the rehabilitation of speech perception by hearing aids as assessed by the Freiburg monosyllabic test in quiet and at conversational levels.The general applicability of speech audiometric measurements in noise is limited. Alternative ("modern") methods and the definitions of noise situations relevant to everyday life have been discussed for years. However, the introduction of these methods into everyday use has proven difficult. On one hand, there is comparatively little practical experience; on the other, it has not yet been demonstrated what additional benefits these more complicated measurements might have for standard hearing aid evaluations and hearing aid users.

Keywords:  Noise; Rehabilitation; Speech audiometry; Speech discrimination tests; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27299893     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0178-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  15 in total

1.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.

Authors:  W A Dreschler; H Verschuure; C Ludvigsen; S Westermann
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  [Check of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  K Schorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Modern speech tests on their way from research into practice : Expectations and reality].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Thomas Hocke; Jürgen Hedderich; Joachim Müller-Deile
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].

Authors:  H von Wedel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; M Pilnik; K Saager-Post; S Dazert; S Biedron; J Oeken; D Mürbe; J Löbert; R Laszig; T Wesarg; C Langer; S Plontke; T Rahne; U Machate; R Noppeney; K Schultz; P Plinkert; S Hoth; M Praetorius; P Schlattmann; E F Meister; H W Pau; K Ehrt; R Hagen; W Shehata-Dieler; M Cebulla; L E Walther; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Results in using the Freiburger monosyllabic speech test in noise without and with hearing aids.

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler; L Verges; Ch Langer; U Machate; R Noppeney; K Schultz; J Kleeberg; B Junge-Hülsing; L E Walther; P Schlattmann; A Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  [The Heidelberg CI database module : Quality control in hearing restoration with cochlear implants].

Authors:  I T Herisanu; S Hoth; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 4.  Diagnostics and therapy of sudden hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-19

5.  [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].

Authors:  Max Engler; Frank Digeser; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.