Literature DB >> 18685820

[Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].

J Müller-Deile1, T Kortmann, U Hoppe, H Hessel, A Morsnowski.   

Abstract

The aim of this multicenter clinical field study was to assess the benefits of the new Freedom 24 sound processor for cochlear implant (CI) users implanted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. The study included 48 postlingually profoundly deaf experienced CI users who demonstrated speech comprehension performance with their current speech processor on the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) in quiet conditions of at least 80% correct scores and who were able to perform adaptive speech threshold testing using the OLSA in noisy conditions. Following baseline measures of speech comprehension performance with their current speech processor, subjects were upgraded to the Freedom 24 speech processor. After a take-home trial period of at least 2 weeks, subject performance was evaluated by measuring the speech reception threshold with the Freiburg multisyllabic word test and speech intelligibility with the Freiburg monosyllabic word test at 50 dB and 70 dB in the sound field. The results demonstrated highly significant benefits for speech comprehension with the new speech processor. Significant benefits for speech comprehension were also demonstrated with the new speech processor when tested in competing background noise.In contrast, use of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) did not prove to be a suitably sensitive assessment tool for comparative subjective self-assessment of hearing benefits with each processor. Use of the preprocessing algorithm known as adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) in the Freedom 24 led to additional improvements over the standard upgrade map for speech comprehension in quiet and showed equivalent performance in noise. Through use of the preprocessing beam-forming algorithm BEAM, subjects demonstrated a highly significant improved signal-to-noise ratio for speech comprehension thresholds (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio for 50% speech comprehension scores) when tested with an adaptive procedure using the Oldenburg sentences in the clinical setting S(0)N(CI), with speech signal at 0 degrees and noise lateral to the CI at 90 degrees . With the convincing findings from our evaluations of this multicenter study cohort, a trial with the Freedom 24 sound processor for all suitable CI users is recommended. For evaluating the benefits of a new processor, the comparative assessment paradigm used in our study design would be considered ideal for use with individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18685820     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-008-1781-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  11 in total

1.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.

Authors:  Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A digital processing strategy to optimize hearing aid outputs directly.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey; Lois F A Martin; Hayley J Fiket
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 3.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

4.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; J Kiefer; J Wyss; J Nicolai; R Battmer
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2008-03

6.  Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.

Authors:  P W Dawson; A E Vandali; M R Knight; J M Heasman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Louise H Loiselle
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Maj; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  13 in total

1.  Hearing restoration: Graeme Clark, Ingeborg Hochmair, and Blake Wilson receive the 2013 Lasker~DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award.

Authors:  Corinne Williams
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; D Rostalski; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Subjective improvement of hearing through cochlear implantation].

Authors:  N Volleth; A Hast; E K Lehmann; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Mathieu Marx; Frederic Venail; Natalie Loundon; Samantha Roux-Vaillard; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [The Heidelberg CI database module : Quality control in hearing restoration with cochlear implants].

Authors:  I T Herisanu; S Hoth; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].

Authors:  J Löhler; L Moser; D Heinrich; K Hörmann; L E Walther
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  [Cochlear implant treatment in Germany].

Authors:  R Jacob; Y Stelzig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.