Literature DB >> 16482466

[The tasks of the ENT specialist by hearing aid fitting. Part 2: checking the fit, subjective satisfaction, ear mold and hearing aid].

K Schorn1.   

Abstract

The second part of this series deals with the tasks of the ENT-specialist, who must not endorse the prescription before making sure that the hearing aid recommended by the acoustician will bring sufficient hearing improvement, and that the suggested hearing aid is suitable. The report and audiograms of the acoustician must be compared to his own results, and a check of whether at least three hearing aids from different companies have been compared must be made. The primary aim of patient satisfaction can be checked by means of the "Oldenburger Inventar" (Oldenburg questionnaire), which determines the improvement of hearing ability in quiet and noise, and of auditory localization. Since the otoplastic substantially effects the amplification of the hearing aid, the ENT specialist should make sure that it does not produce feedback, that it has a second boring, and, in case of need, a Libby horn. He should also consider whether an open fitting would be more appropriate. A free-field measurement--with and without noise--shows whether the dB(opt) has been reached. The in situ measurement and the loudness rating by the Würzburger Hörfeld (Wuerzburg auditory field) are of great help in detecting fitting errors. Additional procedures, such as auditory speech training, lip reading, or technical devices, for instance FM-communication or a light alarm clock, are often employed in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482466     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1378-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  4 in total

1.  [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].

Authors:  K Schorn; U Baumann
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  [Reference curves for hearing surface scaling in clinical use].

Authors:  U Baumann; I Stemplinger; B Arnold; K Schorn
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  [Hearing aids in the elderly. Why is the accommodation so difficult?].

Authors:  G Hesse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].

Authors:  R Thümmler; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].

Authors:  Max Engler; Frank Digeser; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.