Literature DB >> 19517079

[Audiologic rehabilitation of patients with cochlear implants].

S Hoth1, J Müller-Deile.   

Abstract

The outcome and success of rehabilitation of patients with cochlear implants (CIs) is determined to a large extent by the preoperative diagnostics and individual fitting of the speech processor and is assessed by the auditory performance of the CI recipient. Due to the wide spectrum of auditory abilities of recipients and to the large variability with respect to their age and experience, the postoperative audiologic assessment is based on a large battery of subjective tests and objective measures. The results of these functional tests are used for documenting the level of rehabilitation, and they determine the actions taken for fine-tuning the fitting of the speech processor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19517079     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-009-1924-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  19 in total

1.  Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants.

Authors:  K Stephan; K Welzl-Müller
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.

Authors:  Guido F Smoorenburg; Christina Willeboer; Johannes E van Dijk
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen; Louise M Richardson; Elaine Saunders; Robert S C Cowan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

Authors:  Andre Morsnowski; Basile Charasse; Lionel Collet; Matthijs Killian; Joachim Müller-Deile
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  I Hochmair-Desoyer; E Schulz; L Moser; M Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

7.  Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Blake C Papsin; Robert V Harrison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Dillier; R D Battmer; W H Döring; J Müller-Deile
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1995 May-Jun

9.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech.

Authors:  C L De Filippo; B L Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  [Measuring late electrically evoked potentials of the auditory system in cochlear implant patients].

Authors:  S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Auditory group therapy in adult cochlear implant rehabilitation].

Authors:  C Glaubitz; E K Lehmann; L Weber; A-M Kulke; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Cochlear implant fitting strategies].

Authors:  U Hoppe; T Liebscher; J Hornung
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Phoneme discrimination training with experienced cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  A Schumann; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].

Authors:  S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Algorithm-Based Hearing and Speech Therapy Rehabilitation after Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Theda Eichler; Wiebke Rötz; Christoph Kayser; Felix Bröhl; Michael Römer; Arne Henning Witteborg; Franz Kummert; Tobias Sandmeier; Christoph Schulte; Patricia Stolz; Katharina Meyer; Holger Sudhoff; Ingo Todt
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-29

8.  Speech comprehension across multiple CI processor generations: Scene dependent signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Britta Böhnke; Alexander Mewes; Patrick Munder; Stefan J Mauger; Thomas Hocke
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-15

9.  [New ways in hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation].

Authors:  C Völter; C Schirmer; M Röber; D Hinsen; S Dazert; K Bilda
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.284

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.