Literature DB >> 30804086

Cortical Correlates of Attention to Auditory Features.

Emily J Allen1, Philip C Burton2, Juraj Mesik2, Cheryl A Olman2, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Pitch and timbre are two primary features of auditory perception that are generally considered independent. However, an increase in pitch (produced by a change in fundamental frequency) can be confused with an increase in brightness (an attribute of timbre related to spectral centroid) and vice versa. Previous work indicates that pitch and timbre are processed in overlapping regions of the auditory cortex, but are separable to some extent via multivoxel pattern analysis. Here, we tested whether attention to one or other feature increases the spatial separation of their cortical representations and if attention can enhance the cortical representation of these features in the absence of any physical change in the stimulus. Ten human subjects (four female, six male) listened to pairs of tone triplets varying in pitch, timbre, or both and judged which tone triplet had the higher pitch or brighter timbre. Variations in each feature engaged common auditory regions with no clear distinctions at a univariate level. Attending to one did not improve the separability of the neural representations of pitch and timbre at the univariate level. At the multivariate level, the classifier performed above chance in distinguishing between conditions in which pitch or timbre was discriminated. The results confirm that the computations underlying pitch and timbre perception are subserved by strongly overlapping cortical regions, but reveal that attention to one or other feature leads to distinguishable activation patterns even in the absence of physical differences in the stimuli.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although pitch and timbre are generally thought of as independent auditory features of a sound, pitch height and timbral brightness can be confused for one another. This study shows that pitch and timbre variations are represented in overlapping regions of auditory cortex, but that they produce distinguishable patterns of activation. Most importantly, the patterns of activation can be distinguished based on whether subjects attended to pitch or timbre even when the stimuli remained physically identical. The results therefore show that variations in pitch and timbre are represented by overlapping neural networks, but that attention to different features of the same sound can lead to distinguishable patterns of activation.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; auditory cortex; fMRI; pitch; timbre

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30804086      PMCID: PMC6788818          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0588-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A R Palmer; A Q Summerfield; M R Elliott; E M Gurney; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Analysis of the spectral envelope of sounds by the human brain.

Authors:  J D Warren; A R Jennings; T D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with fMRI.

Authors:  Alexander Degerman; Teemu Rinne; Juha Salmi; Oili Salonen; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

6.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The skill of recognizing musical structures.

Authors:  A L Beal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-09

9.  Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception.

Authors:  Nima Mesgarani; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  Infant Pitch and Timbre Discrimination in the Presence of Variation in the Other Dimension.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Andrew J Oxenham; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-14

2.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.