Literature DB >> 32359332

Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Anahita H Mehta1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between fundamental frequency difference limens (F0DLs) and the lowest harmonic number present over a wide range of F0s (30-2000 Hz) for 12-component harmonic complex tones that were presented in either sine or random phase. For fundamental frequencies (F0s) between 100 and 400 Hz, a transition from low (∼1%) to high (∼5%) F0DLs occurred as the lowest harmonic number increased from about seven to ten, in line with earlier studies. At lower and higher F0s, the transition between low and high F0DLs occurred at lower harmonic numbers. The worsening performance at low F0s was reasonably well predicted by the expected decrease in spectral resolution below about 500 Hz. At higher F0s, the degradation in performance at lower harmonic numbers could not be predicted by changes in spectral resolution but remained relatively good (<2%-3%) in some conditions, even when all harmonics were above 8 kHz, confirming that F0 can be extracted from harmonics even when temporal envelope or fine-structure cues are weak or absent.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32359332      PMCID: PMC7166120          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A duplex theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  J C R LICKLIDER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1951-04-15

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Rate discrimination of high-pass-filtered pulse trains.

Authors:  J K Cullen; G R Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Helen J Flanagan; Joe Adams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Toby T Wells; Christopher Bergevin; Joseph Sollini; Heather A Kreft; Alan R Palmer; Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Deep neural network models reveal interplay of peripheral coding and stimulus statistics in pitch perception.

Authors:  Mark R Saddler; Ray Gonzalez; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Authors:  Joseph D Wagner; Alice Gelman; Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pitch perception at very high frequencies: On psychometric functions and integration of frequency information.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Human discrimination and modeling of high-frequency complex tones shed light on the neural codes for pitch.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.