Literature DB >> 21502495

Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch.

Andrew J Oxenham1, Christophe Micheyl, Michael V Keebler, Adam Loper, Sébastien Santurette.   

Abstract

Humans' ability to recognize musical melodies is generally limited to pure-tone frequencies below 4 or 5 kHz. This limit coincides with the highest notes on modern musical instruments and is widely believed to reflect the upper limit of precise stimulus-driven spike timing in the auditory nerve. We tested the upper limits of pitch and melody perception in humans using pure and harmonic complex tones, such as those produced by the human voice and musical instruments, in melody recognition and pitch-matching tasks. We found that robust pitch perception can be elicited by harmonic complex tones with fundamental frequencies below 2 kHz, even when all of the individual harmonics are above 6 kHz--well above the currently accepted existence region of pitch and above the currently accepted limits of neural phase locking. The results suggest that the perception of musical pitch at high frequencies is not constrained by temporal phase locking in the auditory nerve but may instead stem from higher-level constraints shaped by prior exposure to harmonic sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502495      PMCID: PMC3088642          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015291108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system.

Authors:  S Shamma; D Klein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the temporal mechanism involved in the pitch of unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  C Kaernbach; C Bering
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

6.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Limitations on rate discrimination.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  48 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Infant pitch perception: Missing fundamental melody discrimination.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Kaylah Lalonde; Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectro-temporal templates unify the pitch percepts of resolved and unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Kelsey Dutta
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

6.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-20

7.  Auditory deficits in amusia extend beyond poor pitch perception.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  William P Shofner; Jeannine Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch perception: dissociating frequency from fundamental-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Dual-pitch processing mechanisms in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.