| Literature DB >> 24599120 |
Fidele Ntie-Kang1, Pascal Amoa Onguéné2, Ghislain W Fotso3, Kerstin Andrae-Marobela4, Merhatibeb Bezabih5, Jean Claude Ndom2, Bonaventure T Ngadjui6, Abiodun O Ogundaini7, Berhanu M Abegaz8, Luc Mbaze Meva'a2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Natural products play a key role in drug discovery programs, both serving as drugs and as templates for the synthesis of drugs, even though the quantities and availabilities of samples for screening are often limitted. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A current collection of physical samples of > 500 compound derived from African medicinal plants aimed at screening for drug discovery has been made by donations from several researchers from across the continent to be directly available for drug discovery programs. A virtual library of 3D structures of compounds has been generated and Lipinski's "Rule of Five" has been used to evaluate likely oral availability of the samples.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24599120 PMCID: PMC3944075 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 4Chemical structures of selected bioactive natural products from the p-ANAPL library (1 to 7).
Figure 1Pie chart showing the distribution by compound type.
Figure 2Pair-wise distribution of Lipinski parameters for the p-ANAPL library; (A) log P against MW, (B) HBA against MW, (C) HBD against MW and (D) NRB against MW.
Figure 3Distribution of Lipinski parameters for the p-ANAPL library; (A) Bar chart showing the number of Lipinski violations, (B) Bar chart showing the MW parameter, (C) Plot of the lipophilicity parameter, (D) Plot of the HBA parameter, (E) Plot of the HBD parameter, and (F) Plot of the NRB parameter.
Summary of physico-chemical properties (often used to predict ‘drug-likeness’) of the compounds within the p-ANAPL library.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| p-ANAPL | 534 | 1428 | 1131.27 | 84.16 | 370.19 | 13.96 | –4.12 | 3.02 | 24 | 0 | 6.12 | 13 | 0 | 2.79 | 21 | 0 | 3.26 |
|
| 363 | 943 | 487.55 | 84.16 | 303.22 | 5.98 | –4.12 | 2.48 | 10 | 0 | 5.26 | 5 | 0 | 2.07 | 13 | 0 | 2.57 |
|
| 304 | 774 | 448.43 | 84.16 | 285.49 | 5.30 | –4.12 | 2.42 | 8 | 0 | 4.98 | 5 | 0 | 2.03 | 7 | 0 | 2.37 |
|
| 61 | 115 | 248.32 | 84.14 | 190.08 | 3.62 | –0.36 | 1.76 | 5 | 0 | 3.20 | 3 | 0 | 1.16 | 2 | 0 | 0.98 |
Library; Number of tautomers; Molecular weight; Logarithm of n-octanol/water partition coefficient; Number of hydrogen bond acceptors; Number of hydrogen bond donors; Number of rotatable single bonds; Maximum number; Minimum number; Mean value; The “drug-like” library was selected following Lipinski’s criteria [44]–[45]; The “lead-like” library was selected following Oprea’s criteria [46]–[48]; The “fragment-like” library was selected following Verdonk’s criteria [50].
Figure 5Chemical structures of natural products from the p-ANAPL library with log P > 8 units.
Figure 6Chemical structures of selected bioactive natural products from the p-ANAPL library (14 to 36).