| Literature DB >> 24205103 |
Fidele Ntie-Kang1, Denis Zofou, Smith B Babiaka, Rolande Meudom, Michael Scharfe, Lydia L Lifongo, James A Mbah, Luc Meva'a Mbaze, Wolfgang Sippl, Simon M N Efange.
Abstract
Computer-aided drug design (CADD) often involves virtual screening (VS) of large compound datasets and the availability of such is vital for drug discovery protocols. We assess the bioactivity and "drug-likeness" of a relatively small but structurally diverse dataset (containing >1,000 compounds) from African medicinal plants, which have been tested and proven a wide range of biological activities. The geographical regions of collection of the medicinal plants cover the entire continent of Africa, based on data from literature sources and information from traditional healers. For each isolated compound, the three dimensional (3D) structure has been used to calculate physico-chemical properties used in the prediction of oral bioavailability on the basis of Lipinski's "Rule of Five". A comparative analysis has been carried out with the "drug-like", "lead-like", and "fragment-like" subsets, as well as with the Dictionary of Natural Products. A diversity analysis has been carried out in comparison with the ChemBridge diverse database. Furthermore, descriptors related to absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) have been used to predict the pharmacokinetic profile of the compounds within the dataset. Our results prove that drug discovery, beginning with natural products from the African flora, could be highly promising. The 3D structures are available and could be useful for virtual screening and natural product lead generation programs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24205103 PMCID: PMC3813505 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Bar chart showing the distribution of the compounds within AfroDb by region of collection.
Figure 2Graph distribution of features that determine “drug-likeness”.
(A, B) Histogram of Lipinski violations as a percentage of the AfroDb data set and molar weight distribution, respectively. (C, D, E, F) Distribution curves of the log P, HBA, HBD and NRB, respectively for the 1,008 compounds currently in AfroDb. For subfigure B, the x-axis label is the lower limit of binned data, e.g. 0 is equivalent to 0 to 100.
Figure 32D structures of the three compounds with log P values >14, included in AfroDb.
Sources and biological activities of metabolites with calculated log P>14 found in AfroDb.
| Compound | Plant source (country) | Measured activity | Reference |
|
|
| xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity |
|
|
|
| antifungal activity against |
|
|
|
| antifungal activities against |
|
Figure 4Pairwise comparison of mutual relationships between molecular descriptors.
(A) The distribution of the calculated log P versus MW, (B) HBA against MW, (C) HBD against MW and (D) NRB versus MW. LCR represents the Lipinski compliant regions.
Figure 5Comparison of property distribution for the two datasets by percentage distributions.
(A) MW, (B) log P, (C) HBA and (D) HBD. DNP in red and AfroDb in blue. For subfigure B, the x-axis label is the lower limit of binned data, e.g. −2 is equivalent to −2 to −1.
Figure 6Distribution curves for #stars within the AfroDb library, along with the standard “drug-like”, “lead-like” and “fragment-like” subsets.
Blue = AfroDb library, red = “drug-like” subset, green = “lead-like” subset and violet = “fragment-like” subset.
Summary of average predicted pharmacokinetic property distributions of the total AfroDb library in comparison with the various subsets.
| Library name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1008 | 48 | 406 | 3.99 | 5.76 | 1.67 | 6.30 |
|
| 610 | 73 | 328 | 2.99 | 4.89 | 1.25 | 4.24 |
|
| 239 | 75 | 266 | 2.44 | 3.91 | 0.87 | 3.43 |
|
| 51 | 76 | 219 | 1.89 | 3.39 | 0.60 | 1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.90 | 1516 | 674 | 415 | 1265 | −5.11 | 0.59 |
|
| −0.63 | 1663 | 568 | 312 | 1030 | −3.88 | 0.21 |
|
| −0.57 | 2032 | 492 | 235 | 860 | −3.11 | −0.02 |
|
| −0.29 | 1983 | 424 | 139 | 712 | −2.50 | −0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 859 | 0.009 | 0.84 | 41.78 | −4.68 | −2.84 | 6.13 |
|
| 944 | 0.008 | 0.87 | 33.75 | −4.33 | −2.73 | 4.85 |
|
| 1206 | 0.005 | 0.89 | 27.54 | −3.99 | −2.55 | 3.56 |
|
| 1078 | 0.005 | 0.91 | 23.27 | −3.90 | −2.39 | 2.28 |
Size or number of compounds in library;
Percentage of compounds with #star = 0;
Molar weight (range for 95% of drugs: 130–725 Da);
Logarithm of partitioning coefficient between n-octanol and water phases (range for 95% of drugs: −2 to 6);
Number of hydrogen bonds accepted by the molecule (range for 95% of drugs: 2–20);
Number of hydrogen bonds donated by the molecule (range for 95% of drugs: 0–6).;
Number of rotatable bonds (range for 95% of drugs: 0–15);
Logarithm of predicted blood/brain barrier partition coefficient (range for 95% of drugs: −3.0 to 1.0);
Predicted apparent Caco-2 cell membrane permeability in Boehringer–Ingelheim scale, in nm/s (range for 95% of drugs: <5 low, >100 high);
Total solvent-accessible molecular surface, in Å2 (probe radius 1.4 Å) (range for 95% of drugs: 300–1000 Å2);
Hydrophobic portion of the solvent-accessible molecular surface, in Å2 (probe radius 1.4 Å) (range for 95% of drugs: 0–750 (Å2);
Total volume of molecule enclosed by solvent-accessible molecular surface, in Å3 (probe radius 1.4 Å) (range for 95% of drugs: 500–2000 Å3);
Logarithm of aqueous solubility (range for 95% of drugs: −6.0 to 0.5);
Logarithm of predicted binding constant to human serum albumin (range for 95% of drugs: −1.5 to 1.2);
Predicted apparent MDCK cell permeability in nm/sec (<25 poor, >500 great);
Index of cohesion interaction in solids (0.0 to 0.05 for 95% of drugs);
Globularity descriptor (0.75 to 0.95 for 95% of drugs);
Predicted polarizability (13.0 to 70.0 for 95% of drugs);
Predicted IC50 value for blockage of HERG K+ channels (concern<−5);
Predicted skin permeability (−8.0 to −1.0 for 95% of drugs);
Number of likely metabolic reactions (range for 95% of drugs: 1–8).
Figure 7Distibution curves for some computed ADME parameters.
(A) logB/B, (B) logK HSA, (C) logHERG. For subfigure B, the x-axis label is the lower limit of binned data, e.g. −2 is equivalent to −2 to −1. The colour codes are according to Figure 5.
Figure 8A simple descriptor-based comparison of the AfroDb database and the ChemBridge Diversity database.
Comparison of typical physico-chemical property distributions (MW, HBA, HBD, NCC, NO, NRB, log P, NR and TPSA) in the AfroDb (green) and ChemBridge Diverset (red) database. All histograms and scatterplots were generated with the R software [85].
Figure 9A principal component analysis (PCA) plot, showing the comparison of the chemical space defined by the NPs in AfroDb (green) and the chemical space represented by NPs in the ChemBridge Diversity (red) databases.
Figure 10MCSS panel in AfroDb, featuring the most common cyclic structures included in the database.
Summary of selected promising potent compounds derived from African medicinal plants and currently included in AfroDb.
| Compound | Plant source (country) | Measured activity(ies) | Reference |
|
|
| Induction of apoptosis in Human promyelocytic leukemia cells |
|
|
|
| Cytotoxic, antitrypanosomal |
|
|
|
| Anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic and antitumor activities,inhibiting the activity of IκB kinase |
|
|
|
| Anticancer |
|
|
|
| Anticancer |
|
|
|
| Anti-malarial |
|
Figure 112D structures of selected promising compounds derived from the African flora and included in AfroDb.