Literature DB >> 26233038

Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Agnès C Léger1, Charlotte M Reed2, Joseph G Desloge2, Jayaganesh Swaminathan2, Louis D Braida2.   

Abstract

Consonant-identification ability was examined in normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners in the presence of steady-state and 10-Hz square-wave interrupted speech-shaped noise. The Hilbert transform was used to process speech stimuli (16 consonants in a-C-a syllables) to present envelope cues, temporal fine-structure (TFS) cues, or envelope cues recovered from TFS speech. The performance of the HI listeners was inferior to that of the NH listeners both in terms of lower levels of performance in the baseline condition and in the need for higher signal-to-noise ratio to yield a given level of performance. For NH listeners, scores were higher in interrupted noise than in steady-state noise for all speech types (indicating substantial masking release). For HI listeners, masking release was typically observed for TFS and recovered-envelope speech but not for unprocessed and envelope speech. For both groups of listeners, TFS and recovered-envelope speech yielded similar levels of performance and consonant confusion patterns. The masking release observed for TFS and recovered-envelope speech may be related to level effects associated with the manner in which the TFS processing interacts with the interrupted noise signal, rather than to the contributions of TFS cues per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233038      PMCID: PMC4514718          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors:  O Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Sheng Liu; Ginger Stickney; Elsa Del Rio; Ying-Yee Kong; Hongbin Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Authors:  Michael R Wirtzfeld; Rasha A Ibrahim; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26

2.  Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Laura A D'Aquila
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Authors:  Rafael Barona; Juan Antonio Vizcaino; Claudio Krstulovic; Luz Barona; Carmen Comeche; Jose Montalt; Mercedes Ubeda; Carolina Polo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Laura A D'Aquila; Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Maxin Chen; Petrina LaFaire; Xiaodong Tan; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.