Literature DB >> 18556160

Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants.

Mohamed Bingabr1, Blas Espinoza-Varas, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

A model was developed to simulate acoustically the effects of excitation spread in cochlear implants (CI). Based on neurophysiologic data, the proposed model simulates the electrical-current decay rate associated with broad and narrow types of excitation, such as those produced by monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations. The effect of excitation spread on speech intelligibility was simulated in normal-hearing subjects by varying the slopes of the synthesis bands in the noise vocoder. Sentences and monosyllabic words processed via 4-16 channels of stimulation with varying degrees of excitation spread were presented to normal-hearing listeners for identification. Results showed significant interaction between spectral resolution (number of channels) and spread of excitation. The effect of narrowing the excitation spread was minimal when the spectral resolution was sufficiently good (>8 channels) but it was significant when the spectral resolution was poor (4 channels). A significant decrement in performance was observed for extremely narrow excitation spread. This outcome is partly consistent with behavioral data obtained with cochlear implant studies in that CI users tend to do as well or better with monopolar stimulation than with bipolar stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556160      PMCID: PMC2596864          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D J Morris; B E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-11

4.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

6.  Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Philipos C Loizou; Lakshmi N Mishra; Peter F Assmann; Robert V Shannon; Jane M Opie
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

9.  Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  B E Pfingst; K H Franck; L Xu; E M Bauer; T A Zwolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

10.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  36 in total

1.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

4.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

5.  The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Authors:  Daan J van de Velde; Niels O Schiller; Vincent J van Heuven; Claartje C Levelt; Joost van Ginkel; Mieke Beers; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

7.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.