Literature DB >> 17116863

Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Christian Lorenzi1, Gaëtan Gilbert, Héloïse Carn, Stéphane Garnier, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

People with sensorineural hearing loss have difficulty understanding speech, especially when background sounds are present. A reduction in the ability to resolve the frequency components of complex sounds is one factor contributing to this difficulty. Here, we show that a reduced ability to process the temporal fine structure of sounds plays an important role. Speech sounds were processed by filtering them into 16 adjacent frequency bands. The signal in each band was processed by using the Hilbert transform so as to preserve either the envelope (E, the relatively slow variations in amplitude over time) or the temporal fine structure (TFS, the rapid oscillations with rate close to the center frequency of the band). The band signals were then recombined and the stimuli were presented to subjects for identification. After training, normal-hearing subjects scored perfectly with unprocessed speech, and were approximately 90% correct with E and TFS speech. Both young and elderly subjects with moderate flat hearing loss performed almost as well as normal with unprocessed and E speech but performed very poorly with TFS speech, indicating a greatly reduced ability to use TFS. For the younger hearing-impaired group, TFS scores were highly correlated with the ability to take advantage of temporal dips in a background noise when identifying unprocessed speech. The results suggest that the ability to use TFS may be critical for "listening in the background dips." TFS stimuli may be useful in evaluating impaired hearing and in guiding the design of hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116863      PMCID: PMC1693753          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607364103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

Review 1.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

Authors:  S Rosen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech processing in the auditory system. II: Lateral inhibition and the central processing of speech evoked activity in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  R Drullman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons.

Authors:  A J Duquesnoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.

Authors:  H A Gustafsson; S D Arlinger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-12
View more
  198 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

7.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.