Literature DB >> 18189576

A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility.

Finn Dubbelboer1, Tammo Houtgast.   

Abstract

A wavelet representation of speech was used to display the instantaneous amplitude and phase within 14 octave frequency bands, representing the envelope and the carrier within each band. Adding stationary noise alters the wavelet pattern, which can be understood as a combination of three simultaneously occurring subeffects: two effects on the wavelet levels (one systematic and one stochastic) and one effect on the wavelet phases. Specific types of signal processing were applied to speech, which allowed each effect to be either included or excluded. The impact of each effect (and of combinations) on speech intelligibility was measured with CVC's. It appeared that the systematic level effect (i.e., the increase of each speech wavelet intensity with the mean noise intensity) has the most degrading effect on speech intelligibility, which is in accordance with measures such as the modulation transfer function and the speech transmission index. However, also the introduction of stochastic level fluctuations and disturbance of the carrier phase seriously contribute to reduced intelligibility in noise. It is argued that these stochastic effects are responsible for the limited success of spectral subtraction as a means to improve speech intelligibility. Results can provide clues for effective noise suppression with respect to intelligibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189576     DOI: 10.1121/1.2783131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Kamil K Wójcicki; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.

Authors:  Karen L Payton; Mona Shrestha
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Axelle Calcus; Sridhar Kalluri; Olaf Strelcyk; Stanley Sheft; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21

6.  Use of amplitude modulation cues recovered from frequency modulation for cochlear implant users when original speech cues are severely degraded.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Hyun Joon Shim; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-15

7.  Effects of noise reduction on AM perception for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Sridhar Kalluri; Olaf Strelcyk; Stanley Sheft; Franck Miermont; Arnaud Coez; Eric Bizaguet; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

8.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Maxin Chen; Petrina LaFaire; Xiaodong Tan; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.