Literature DB >> 24499966

Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a FIT mailing program.

Jennifer A Schlichting1, Michelle A Mengeling, Nader M Makki, Ashish Malhotra, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, J Stacey Klutts, Barcey T Levy, Peter J Kaboli, Mary E Charlton.   

Abstract

Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned ($27.43 vs. $44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24499966      PMCID: PMC4267004          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  22 in total

1.  A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Timothy R Church; Mark W Yeazel; Resa M Jones; Laura K Kochevar; Gavin D Watt; Steven J Mongin; Jill E Cordes; Deborah Engelhard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Timothy P Johnson; Young Ik Cho; Jennifer A Walk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Leif I Solberg; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Michael J Goodman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Alicia Smith; Graeme P Young; Stephen R Cole; Peter Bampton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Colorectal cancer testing among patients cared for by Iowa family physicians.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Jeffrey Dawson; Arthur J Hartz; Paul A James
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Medicare consumers.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Anna P Schenck; William W Davis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.

Authors:  Leo G van Rossum; Anne F van Rijn; Robert J Laheij; Martijn G van Oijen; Paul Fockens; Han H van Krieken; Andre L Verbeek; Jan B Jansen; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Michelle A Mengeling; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Nader M Makki; Ashish Malhotra; J Stacey Klutts; Barcey T Levy; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  12 in total

1.  Veterans' Continued Participation in an Annual Fecal Immunochemical Test Mailing Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schlichting; Michelle A Mengeling; Nader M Makki; Ashish Malhotra; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; J Stacey Klutts; Barcey T Levy; Peter J Kaboli; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Free Fecal Immunochemical Test Disbursement in Eight Family Physician Offices.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-10

3.  Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jamie H Thompson; Amanda F Petrik; Denis B Nyongesa; Michael C Leo; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Anne Escaron; Alex Chen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; LeAnn Michaels; Jennifer S Rivelli; Melissa L Castillo; Brittany M Younger; Marta Castro; Sacha L Reich; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Becky L Glaze; Casey L Eastman; Roxane C Waldron; Sonja Hoover; T'Ronda Flagg; Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giridhar Mohan; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Donatus U Ekwueme; Susan A Sabatino; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Yinan Peng; Shawna L Mercer; Anilkrishna B Thota
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green; Jennifer Schneider; Edward J Miech; Jennifer Coury; Sally Retecki; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Conn; Stephenie Kennedy-Rea; Sujha Subramanian; Adam Baus; Sonja Hoover; Cheryl Cunningham; Florence K L Tangka
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-09-29

9.  Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Gloria D Coronado; Keith Argenbright; Alison T Brenner; Sheila F Castañeda; Jason A Dominitz; Beverly Green; Rachel B Issaka; Theodore R Levin; Daniel S Reuland; Lisa C Richardson; Douglas J Robertson; Amit G Singal; Michael Pignone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 286.130

10.  Increase in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate by a Round-Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Testing Kit and Associated Factors in Underserved Regions of Korea: A Community-Based Intervention Study.

Authors:  Seri Hong; Hye Young Shin; Bomyee Lee; Na Rae Hwang; Sang-Hyun Hwang; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.