Literature DB >> 31068395

Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Jamie H Thompson1, Melinda M Davis2, LeAnn Michaels2, Jennifer S Rivelli2, Melissa L Castillo2, Brittany M Younger2, Marta Castro2, Sacha L Reich2, Gloria D Coronado2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, and screening rates are disproportionately low among Latinos. One factor thought to contribute to the low screening rate is the difficulty Latinos encounter in understanding health information, and therefore in taking appropriate health action. Therefore, we used Boot Camp Translation (BCT), a patient engagement approach, to engage Latino stakeholders (ie, patients, clinic staff) in refining the messages and format of colon cancer screening reminders for a clinic-based direct mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program.
METHODS: Patient participants were Latino, ages 50 to 75 years, able to speak English or Spanish, and willing to participate in the in-person kickoff meeting and follow-up phone calls over a 3-month period. We held separate BCT sessions for English- and Spanish-speaking participants. As part of the in-person meetings, a bilingual colon cancer expert presented on colon health and screening messages and BCT facilitators led interactive sessions where participants reviewed materials and reminder messages in various modalities (eg, letter, text). Participants considered what information about colon cancer screening was important, the best methods to share these messages, and the timing and frequency with which these messages should be delivered to patients to encourage FIT completion. We used follow-up phone calls to iteratively refine materials developed based on key learnings from the in-person meeting.
RESULTS: Twenty-five adults participated in the in-person sessions (English [n = 12]; Spanish [n = 13]). Patient participants were primarily enrolled in Medicaid/uninsured (76%) and had annual household incomes less than $20,000 (67%). Key themes distilled from the sessions included increasing awareness that screening can prevent colon cancer, stressing the urgency of screening, emphasizing the motivating influence of family, and using personalized messages from the practice such as 'I' or 'we' statements in letters or automated phone call reminders delivered by humans. Participants in both sessions noted the importance of receiving an automated or live alert before a FIT kit is mailed and a reminder within 2 weeks of FIT kit mailing. DISCUSSION: Using BCT, we successfully incorporated participant feedback to adapt culturally relevant health messages to promote FIT testing among Latino patients served by community clinics. Materials will be tested in the larger Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT) trial. © Copyright 2019 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer; Colorectal Cancer; Early Detection of Cancer; Hispanic Americans; Medicaid; Occult Blood; Patient Participation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31068395      PMCID: PMC7254880          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  29 in total

1.  Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.

Authors:  Ned Norman; Chris Bennett; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Martha Flores; Rafael Flores; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse Population Served by a Safety-Net Clinic.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nagelhout; Kristen Comarell; N Jewel Samadder; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

4.  Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; LeAnn Michaels; Jennifer S Rivelli; Melissa L Castillo; Brittany M Younger; Marta Castro; Sacha L Reich; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  David W Baker; Tiffany Brown; David R Buchanan; Jordan Weil; Kate Balsley; Lauren Ranalli; Ji Young Lee; Kenzie A Cameron; M Rosario Ferreira; Quinn Stephens; Shira N Goldman; Alred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Muriel Jean-Jacques; Erin O Kaleba; John L Gatta; Gabriela Gracia; Elizabeth R Ryan; Bechara N Choucair
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Gloria Coronado; Sally W Vernon; Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer; Beti Thompson; Melchor Ortiz; David Lairson; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Use of text-message reminders to improve participation in a population-based breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  C Vidal; M Garcia; L Benito; N Milà; G Binefa; V Moreno
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis.

Authors:  David H Smith; Adrienne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David M Mosen; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Meyers; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer S Rivelli; Morgan J Fuoco; William M Vollmer; Amanda F Petrik; Erin Keast; Sara Barker; Emily Topalanchik; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  8 in total

1.  Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jamie H Thompson; Amanda F Petrik; Denis B Nyongesa; Michael C Leo; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Anne Escaron; Alex Chen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; LeAnn Michaels; Jennifer S Rivelli; Melissa L Castillo; Brittany M Younger; Marta Castro; Sacha L Reich; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

4.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Persistent Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Amid Centralized Outreach: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Jocelyn V Wainwright; Shivan J Mehta; Alicia Clifton; Claire Bocage; Shannon N Ogden; Sarah Cohen; Katharine A Rendle
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2021-12-31

6.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Michael C Leo; Katrina Ramsey; Jennifer Coury; Amanda F Petrik; Mary Patzel; Erin S Kenzie; Jamie H Thompson; Erik Brodt; Raj Mummadi; Nancy Elder; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Notification Phone Calls vs Text Messages Prior to Mailed Fecal Test Outreach.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Denis B Nyongesa; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Anne L Escaron; Brittany Younger; Shelby Harbison; Michael C Leo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 13.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.