Literature DB >> 32583884

Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.

Samir Gupta1,2,3, Gloria D Coronado4, Keith Argenbright5,6,7, Alison T Brenner8,9, Sheila F Castañeda10, Jason A Dominitz11,12, Beverly Green13,14,15, Rachel B Issaka16,17, Theodore R Levin18,19, Daniel S Reuland8,9, Lisa C Richardson20, Douglas J Robertson21,22, Amit G Singal23, Michael Pignone24.   

Abstract

Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer (CRC); colorectal neoplasms; evidence based; fecal immunochemical test (FIT); mailed outreach

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583884      PMCID: PMC7523556          DOI: 10.3322/caac.21615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   286.130


  77 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Barriers to Completing a Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Uninsured Patients.

Authors:  Katelyn K Jetelina; Joshua S Yudkin; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Alicea Lieberman; Samir Gupta; Bijal A Balasubramanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT): Study protocol for a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David H Smith; Amanda F Petrik; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Pre-notification increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening in all demographic groups: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gillian Libby; Jane Bray; Jennifer Champion; Linda A Brownlee; Janice Birrell; Dermot R Gorman; Emilia M Crighton; Callum G Fraser; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Amanda F Petrik; William M Vollmer; Stephen H Taplin; Erin M Keast; Scott Fields; Beverly B Green
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Diego Llovet; Mardie Serenity; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Caroline A Bravo; Bronwen R McCurdy; Catherine Dubé; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Amanda Peters; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Population-based colorectal cancer screening: comparison of two fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Miren B Zubero; Eunate Arana-Arri; José I Pijoan; Isabel Portillo; Isabel Idigoras; Antonio López-Urrutia; Ana Samper; Begoña Uranga; Carmen Rodríguez; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Arielle Slam; Joanne E Schottinger; Peter Bacchetti; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2018.

Authors:  Djenaba A Joseph; Jessica B King; Nicole F Dowling; Cheryll C Thomas; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  23 in total

1.  Financial Incentives to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening-Time to Cut Our Losses.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

2.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2020-05-13

4.  M6A regulator expression patterns predict the immune microenvironment and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xue Liu; Changsheng Ma; Hui Liu; Zhiqiang Sun; Judong Luo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.322

5.  US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Melissa Plegue; Masahito Jimbo; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Brennan Lanier; Nicole Kluz; Victoria Valencia; Patrick Chang; Todd Olmstead
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  An Update on the Epidemiology, Molecular Characterization, Diagnosis, and Screening Strategies for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Jeffrey K Lee; Joshua Demb; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the United States: Correlates and Time Trends by Type of Test.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Ashwini V Soman; Zahava Berkowitz; Stacey A Fedewa; Susan A Sabatino; Janet S de Moor; Tainya C Clarke; V Paul Doria-Rose; Erica S Breslau; Ahmedin Jemal; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.090

9.  The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic on Access to Endoscopy Procedures in the VA Healthcare System.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Tonya Kaltenbach; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.

Authors:  Jamie Zoellner; Kathleen Porter; Esther Thatcher; Erin Kennedy; James L Werth; Betsy Grossman; Tomas Roatsey; Heather Hamilton; Roger Anderson; Wendy Cohn
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.