Literature DB >> 18838716

Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: To update its recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned 2 studies: 1) a targeted systematic evidence review on 4 selected questions relating to test characteristics and benefits and harms of screening technologies, and 2) a decision analytic modeling analysis using population modeling techniques to compare the expected health outcomes and resource requirements of available screening modalities when used in a programmatic way over time. RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy in adults, beginning at age 50 years and continuing until age 75 years. The risks and benefits of these screening methods vary. (A recommendation). The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for colorectal cancer in adults 76 to 85 years of age. There may be considerations that support colorectal cancer screening in an individual patient. (C recommendation). The USPSTF recommends against screening for colorectal cancer in adults older than age 85 years. (D recommendation). The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits and harms of computed tomographic colonography and fecal DNA testing as screening modalities for colorectal cancer. (I statement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18838716     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  664 in total

1.  Effectiveness of continuing medical education in increasing colorectal cancer screening knowledge among Vietnamese American physicians.

Authors:  Bang H Nguyen; Jane T Pham; Rilene A Chew; Stephen J McPhee; Susan L Stewart; Hiep T Doan
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

Review 2.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

3.  Modestly increased use of colonoscopy when copayments are waived.

Authors:  Shabnam Khatami; Lei Xuan; Rolando Roman; Song Zhang; Charles McConnel; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Evaluation of the use of electronic health data to classify four-year mortality risk for older adults undergoing screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Marie B Synnestvedt; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Incorporating lag time to benefit into prevention decisions for older adults.

Authors:  Sei J Lee; Rosanne M Leipzig; Louise C Walter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Adult intussusception presenting as rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Arshad Mahmood; Qing Zhao Ruan; Richard O'Hara; Khalid Canna
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-28

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  A pilot study to examine colorectal cancer screening in two assisted living communities.

Authors:  Kathryn L Moore; Carmen L Lewis; Sheryl Zimmerman; Kimberly Ward; David Reed; Robert Rodriguez; Christine E Kistler
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.