Literature DB >> 18381468

Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.

Garth H Rauscher1, Timothy P Johnson, Young Ik Cho, Jennifer A Walk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survey data used to study trends in cancer screening may overestimate screening utilization while potentially underestimating existing disparities in use.
METHODS: We did a literature review and meta-analysis of validation studies examining the accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories. We calculated summary random-effects estimates for sensitivity and specificity, separately for mammography, clinical breast exam (CBE), Pap smear, prostate-specific antigen testing (PSA), digital rectal exam, fecal occult blood testing, and colorectal endoscopy.
RESULTS: Sensitivity was highest for mammogram, CBE, and Pap smear (0.95, 0.94, and 0.93, respectively) and lowest for PSA and digital rectal exam histories (0.71 and 0.75). Specificity was highest for endoscopy, fecal occult blood testing, and PSA (0.90, 0.78, and 0.73, respectively) and lowest for CBE, Pap smear, and mammogram histories (0.26, 0.48, and 0.61, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity summary estimates tended to be lower in predominantly Black and Hispanic samples compared with predominantly White samples. When estimates of self-report accuracy from this meta-analysis were applied to cancer-screening prevalence estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, results suggested that prevalence estimates are artificially increased and disparities in prevalence are artificially decreased by inaccurate self-reports.
CONCLUSIONS: National survey data are overestimating cancer-screening utilization for several common procedures and may be masking disparities in screening due to racial/ethnic differences in reporting accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381468     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  213 in total

1.  Role of religious social support in longitudinal relationships between religiosity and health-related outcomes in African Americans.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holt; David L Roth; Jin Huang; Eddie M Clark
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Is the accuracy of self-reported colorectal cancer screening associated with social desirability?

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Peter N Abotchie; Amy McQueen; Arica White; Jan M Eberth; Sharon P Coan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A population-based study of prevalence and adherence trends in average risk colorectal cancer screening, 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Ellen L Goode; Paul J Limburg; Sally W Vernon; Joseph B Wick; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Andrew C Hanson; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Frank A Sinicrope; Noralane M Lindor; Tabetha A Brockman; L Joseph Melton; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma screening in a hepatitis B virus-infected Korean population.

Authors:  Seung Ha Park; Nae Yun Heo; Jong Ha Park; Tae Oh Kim; Sung Yeun Yang; Hyun Kuk Kim; Young Soo Moon; Chang Hoon Kim; Ki Tae Suk; Dong Joon Kim; Heon Young Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Jean O'Malley; David I Buckley; Motomi Mori; David A Lieberman; Lyle J Fagnan; James Wallace; Betty Liu; Cynthia Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Association Between Recency of Immigration and Mammography Uptake: Results from a Canadian National Survey.

Authors:  Prince A Adu; U Vivian Ukah; Sheena D Palmer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

7.  Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague; Donald L Weaver; Anne Marie McCarthy; Chyke A Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ann G Zauber; William E Barlow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Sexual orientation inequalities during provider-patient interactions in provider encouragement of sexual and reproductive health care.

Authors:  Alexa L Solazzo; Ari R Tabaac; Madina Agénor; S Bryn Austin; Brittany M Charlton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Using Public Claims Data for Neighborhood Level Epidemiologie Surveillance of Breast Cancer Screening: Findings from Evaluating a Patient Navigation Program in Chicago's Chinatown.

Authors:  Joe Feinglass; Jennifer M Cooper; Kelsey Rydland; Laura S Tom; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

10.  Impact of familial risk and mammography screening on prognostic indicators of breast disease among women from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Kristine Cooper; Mitra Nabavi; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.