Literature DB >> 30359468

Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.

Kathryn E Kemper1, Becky L Glaze1, Casey L Eastman2, Roxane C Waldron2, Sonja Hoover3, T'Ronda Flagg4, Florence K L Tangka4, Sujha Subramanian3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) mailing programs are effective for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The objectives of the current study were to assess the magnitude of uptake that could be achieved with a mailed FIT program in a federally qualified health center and whether such a program can be implemented at a reasonable cost to support sustainability.
METHODS: The Washington State Department of Health's partner HealthPoint implemented a direct-mail FIT program at 9 medical clinics, along with a follow-up reminder letter and automated telephone calls to those not up-to-date with recommended screening. Supplemental outreach events at selected medical clinics and a 50th birthday card screening reminder program also were implemented. The authors collected and analyzed process, effectiveness, and cost measures and conducted a systematic assessment of the short-term cost effectiveness of the interventions.
RESULTS: Overall, 5178 FIT kits were mailed with 4009 follow-up reminder letters, and 8454 automated reminder telephone calls were made over 12 months. In total, 1607 FIT kits were returned within 3 months of the end of the implementation period: an overall return rate of 31% for the mailed FIT program. The average total intervention cost per FIT kit returned was $39.81, and the intervention implementation cost per kit returned was $18.76.
CONCLUSIONS: The mailed FIT intervention improved CRC screening uptake among HealthPoint's patient population. This intervention was implemented for less than $40 per individual successfully screened. The findings and lessons learned can assist other clinics that serve disadvantaged populations to increase their CRC screening adherence.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Washington; cancer screening; colorectal cancer; community health centers; health care economics and organizations; reminder system

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30359468      PMCID: PMC6263795          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

1.  Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer J Sanchez; Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Feasibility and efficacy of pairing fecal immunochemical testing with mammography for increasing colorectal cancer screening among uninsured Latinas in northern Manhattan.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Charles E Basch; Karen M Schmitt; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Amanda Kimura; Mo-Kyung Sin; Clarence Spigner; Anh Tran; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Costs of promoting cancer screening: Evidence from CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Janet Royalty; Kristy Joseph; Amy DeGroff; Djenaba Joseph; Sajal Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Samir Gupta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Chul Ahn; Noel O Santini; Deepak Agrawal; Christian A Mayorga; Caitlin Murphy; Jasmin A Tiro; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Adam C Loewen; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Maggie C Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers.

Authors:  David T Liss; Dustin D French; David R Buchanan; Tiffany Brown; Bridget G Magner; Stephanie Kollar; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a FIT mailing program.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schlichting; Michelle A Mengeling; Nader M Makki; Ashish Malhotra; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; J Stacey Klutts; Barcey T Levy; Peter J Kaboli; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-04

10.  Cost of starting colorectal cancer screening programs: results from five federally funded demonstration programs.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Bela Bapat; Laura C Seeff; Amy DeGroff; James Gardner; A Blythe Ryerson; Marion Nadel; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  13 in total

1.  Outreach and Inreach Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos at a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Balambal Bharti; Marielena Rojas; Silvia Mercado; Adriana M Bearse; Jasmine Camacho; Manuel Song Lopez; Fatima Muñoz; Shawne O'Connell; Lin Liu; Gregory A Talavera; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Identifying optimal approaches to implement colorectal cancer screening through participation in a learning laboratory.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Amy S DeGroff; Faye L Wong; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Florence K L Tangka; Amy DeGroff; Cynthia S Soloe; Laura C Arena; Dara F Schlueter; Djenaba A Joseph; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green; Jennifer Schneider; Edward J Miech; Jennifer Coury; Sally Retecki; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.

Authors:  Melissa Barajas; Florence K L Tangka; James Schultz; Kulin Tantod; Ying Marilyn Kempster; Ndukaku Omelu; Sonja Hoover; Melonie Thomas; Valerie Richmond-Reese; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-09-29

7.  Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.

Authors:  Karen E Kim; Florence K L Tangka; Manasi Jayaprakash; Fornessa T Randal; Helen Lam; David Freedman; Laurie A Carrier; Coletta Sargant; Chieko Maene; Sonja Hoover; Djenaba Joseph; Cynthia French; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-09-29

8.  Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Brennan Lanier; Nicole Kluz; Victoria Valencia; Patrick Chang; Todd Olmstead
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Gloria D Coronado; Keith Argenbright; Alison T Brenner; Sheila F Castañeda; Jason A Dominitz; Beverly Green; Rachel B Issaka; Theodore R Levin; Daniel S Reuland; Lisa C Richardson; Douglas J Robertson; Amit G Singal; Michael Pignone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 286.130

10.  Identification of the tumor‑suppressive role of circular RNA‑FOXO3 in colorectal cancer via regulation of miR‑543/LATS1 axis.

Authors:  Yun-Yao Deng; Yu-Juan Min; Kun Zhou; Qing-Song Yang; Mei Peng; Zhao-Rui Cui; Xiang-Lian Zhu; Hao Liu; Min Wang; Xie Zhang; Li-Xin Liu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.