Literature DB >> 31068396

Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Gloria D Coronado1, Jamie H Thompson2, Amanda F Petrik2, Denis B Nyongesa2, Michael C Leo2, Melissa Castillo2, Brittany Younger2, Anne Escaron2, Alex Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening has the potential of saving thousands of lives. We compared the effectiveness of automated and live prompts and reminders as part of a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were 1767 adults aged 50 to 75 eyars who were not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations at a participating community health center clinic. In addition to a mailed FIT kit, participants were randomized to receive (1) a text message prompt and 2 automated phone call reminders (automated condition); (2) up to 3 live call reminders (live condition); or (3) a text message prompt, 2 automated call reminders, and up to 3 live reminders (combined automated plus live condition). We assessed FIT completion rates in each group 6 months following randomization. KEY
RESULTS: Nearly one-third of participants completed an FIT within 6 months. Compared with adults allocated to the automated condition, FIT completion rates were higher in adults allocated to the live condition (32.3% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 6.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.1-11.4) and in adults allocated to the combined automated plus live condition (35.7% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 9.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.4-14.9). The number of kits needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT ranged from 2.8 in the combined automated plus live condition to 3.8 in the automated condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Among unscreened individuals in this population, live phone call reminders either alone or in combination with automated prompts and reminders outperformed automated approaches alone. © Copyright 2019 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer; Colorectal Cancer; Community Health Centers; Early Detection of Cancer; Hispanic Americans; Occult Blood; Text Messaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31068396      PMCID: PMC7331468          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  29 in total

1.  Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.

Authors:  Ned Norman; Chris Bennett; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Martha Flores; Rafael Flores; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse Population Served by a Safety-Net Clinic.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nagelhout; Kristen Comarell; N Jewel Samadder; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

4.  Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; LeAnn Michaels; Jennifer S Rivelli; Melissa L Castillo; Brittany M Younger; Marta Castro; Sacha L Reich; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  David W Baker; Tiffany Brown; David R Buchanan; Jordan Weil; Kate Balsley; Lauren Ranalli; Ji Young Lee; Kenzie A Cameron; M Rosario Ferreira; Quinn Stephens; Shira N Goldman; Alred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Muriel Jean-Jacques; Erin O Kaleba; John L Gatta; Gabriela Gracia; Elizabeth R Ryan; Bechara N Choucair
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Gloria Coronado; Sally W Vernon; Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer; Beti Thompson; Melchor Ortiz; David Lairson; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Use of text-message reminders to improve participation in a population-based breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  C Vidal; M Garcia; L Benito; N Milà; G Binefa; V Moreno
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis.

Authors:  David H Smith; Adrienne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David M Mosen; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Meyers; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer S Rivelli; Morgan J Fuoco; William M Vollmer; Amanda F Petrik; Erin Keast; Sara Barker; Emily Topalanchik; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Laura F Gruner; Efrat L Amitay; Thomas Heisser; Feng Guo; Tobias Niedermaier; Anton Gies; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Notification Phone Calls vs Text Messages Prior to Mailed Fecal Test Outreach.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Denis B Nyongesa; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Anne L Escaron; Brittany Younger; Shelby Harbison; Michael C Leo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 13.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.