Literature DB >> 15150305

A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Timothy R Church1, Mark W Yeazel, Resa M Jones, Laura K Kochevar, Gavin D Watt, Steven J Mongin, Jill E Cordes, Deborah Engelhard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer screening by using a fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or barium enema x-ray reduces the incidence of and death from colorectal cancer, the rate of colorectal cancer screening in the general population is low. We conducted a randomized trial consisting of direct mailing of FOBT kits to increase colorectal cancer screening among residents of Wright County, Minnesota, a community in which colorectal cancer screening was promoted.
METHODS: At baseline, we mailed a questionnaire about colorectal cancer screening to a random sample of Wright County residents aged 50 years or older who were randomly selected from the Minnesota State Driver's License and Identification Card database (estimated N = 1451). The sample was randomly allocated into three equal subgroups: one group (control) received only the questionnaire, one group received FOBT kits by direct mail with reminders, and one group received FOBT kits by direct mail without reminders. Study participants were sent a follow-up questionnaire 1 year after baseline. We used the responses to the questionnaires to estimate the 1-year change in self-reported screening rates in each group and the differences in the changes among the groups, along with the associated bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: At baseline, the estimated response rate was 86.5%, self-reported adherence to FOBT guidelines was 21.5%, and overall adherence to any colorectal cancer screening test guidelines was 55.8%. The 1-year rate changes in absolute percentage for self-reported adherence to FOBT use were 1.5% (95% CI = -2.9% to 5.9%) for the control group, 16.9% (95% CI = 11.5% to 22.3%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-no-reminders group, and 23.2% (95% CI = 17.2% to 29.3%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-reminders group. The 1-year rate changes for self-reported adherence to any colorectal cancer screening test were 7.8% (95% CI = 3.2% to 12.0%) for the control group, 13.2% (95% CI = 8.4% to 18.2%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-no-reminders group, and 14.1% (95% CI = 9.1% to 19.1%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-reminders group.
CONCLUSION: Direct mailing of FOBT kits combined with follow-up reminders promotes more rapid increases in the use of FOBT and nearly doubles the increase in overall rate of adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines in a general population compared with a community-wide screening promotion and awareness campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15150305     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  62 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  The effectiveness of a secure email reminder system for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  David Muller; Judith Logan; David Dorr; David Mosen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani; Leda L Danao; Cynthia Antonio; Gabriel M Garcia; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Effectiveness of a theory-based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among Iranian health club members: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Hamideh Salimzadeh; Hassan Eftekhar; Reza Majdzadeh; Ali Montazeri; Alireza Delavari
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-09-13

5.  ColonCancerCheck primary care invitation pilot project: patient perceptions.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Paul Ritvo; S Elizabeth McGregor; Jigisha Patel; Crissa Guglietti; Cheryl A Levitt; Lawrence F Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

8.  Endoscopic follow-up of positive fecal occult blood testing in the Ontario FOBT Project.

Authors:  Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Lori Kiefer; Verna Mai; Paul Ritvo; Terry Sullivan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Lara A Rosenwasser; Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld; Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Amanda N Perry; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.