Literature DB >> 24376949

Anatomy-corresponding method of IMRT verification.

Janusz Winiecki1, Zbigniew Zurawski1, Barbara Drzewiecka1, Krzysztof Slosarek2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During a proper execution of dMLC plans, there occurs an undesired but frequent effect of the dose locally accumulated by tissue being significantly different than expected. The conventional dosimetric QA procedures give only a partial picture of the quality of IMRT treatment, because their solely quantitative outcomes usually correspond more to the total area of the detector than the actually irradiated volume. AIM: The aim of this investigation was to develop a procedure of dynamic plans verification which would be able to visualize the potential anomalies of dose distribution and specify which tissue they exactly refer to. MATERIALS &
METHODS: The paper presents a method discovered and clinically examined in our department. It is based on a Gamma Evaluation concept and allows accurate localization of deviations between predicted and acquired dose distributions, which were registered by portal as well as film dosimetry. All the calculations were performed on the self-made software GammaEval, the γ-images (2-dimensional distribution of γ-values) and γ-histograms were created as quantitative outcomes of verification.
RESULTS: Over 150 maps of dose distribution have been analyzed and the cross-examination of the gamma images with DRRs was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems, that the complex monitoring of treatment would be possible owing to the images obtained as a cross-examination of γ-images and corresponding DRRs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRR; Gamma Evaluation; IMRT; Plan verification; Portal dosimetry; QA

Year:  2010        PMID: 24376949      PMCID: PMC3863168          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  8 in total

1.  The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions.

Authors:  J Deng; T Pawlicki; Y Chen; J Li; S B Jiang; C M Ma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method.

Authors:  Daniel A Low; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation.

Authors:  Tom Depuydt; Ann Van Esch; Dominique Pierre Huyskens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Gamma histograms for radiotherapy plan evaluation.

Authors:  Emiliano Spezi; D Geraint Lewis
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluation criteria for film based intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance.

Authors:  Muhammad Naeem Anjum; William Parker; Russell Ruo; Muhammad Afzal
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Radiographic film dosimetry for IMRT fields in the nearsurface buildup region.

Authors:  Peter L Roberson; Jean M Moran; Ravi Kulasekere
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification.

Authors:  Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  The next generation of radiation oncologists: Challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Arturo Navarro; J Cacicedo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-09-25

3.  A calibration method for patient specific IMRT QA using a single therapy verification film.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Shukla; Arun S Oinam; Sanjeev Kumar; I S Sandhu; S C Sharma
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-05-24

4.  Clinical examples of 3D dose distribution reconstruction, based on the actual MLC leaves movement, for dynamic treatment techniques.

Authors:  Wojciech Osewski; Lukasz Dolla; Michał Radwan; Marta Szlag; Roman Rutkowski; Barbara Smolińska; Krzysztof Slosarek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-07-17

5.  Doses in organs at risk during head and neck radiotherapy using IMRT and 3D-CRT.

Authors:  Magdalena Peszynska-Piorun; Julian Malicki; Wojciech Golusinski
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Robust imaging habitat computation using voxel-wise radiomics features.

Authors:  Kinga Bernatowicz; Francesco Grussu; Marta Ligero; Alonso Garcia; Eric Delgado; Raquel Perez-Lopez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Radiotherapy for inverted papilloma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Primoz Strojan; Simona Jereb; Imre Borsos; Jasna But-Hadzic; Nina Zidar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.