Literature DB >> 12175562

A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation.

Tom Depuydt1, Ann Van Esch, Dominique Pierre Huyskens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a step forward in comparison to conventional, static beam delivery, quality assurance is more complex and labour intensive, demanding detailed two-dimensional dosimetric verification. Regardless of the technique used for measuring the dose distribution, what is essential to the implementation of routine verification of IMRT fields is the efficient and accurate comparison of the measured versus desired dose distribution. In order to achieve a fast, yet accurate quantitative measure of the correspondence between measured and calculated dose, the theoretical concept of the gamma evaluation method presented by Low et al. (Med. Phys., 25 (1998) 656) was converted into a calculation algorithm, taking into account practical considerations related to the discrete nature of the data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A filter cascade of multiple levels was designed to obtain fast and accurate comparison of the two dose distributions under evaluation. The actual comparison consists of classification into accepted or rejected datapoints with respect to user-defined acceptance criteria (dose difference and distance to agreement). The presented algorithm was tested on dosimetric images calculated and/or acquired by means of a liquid filled portal imaging device during the course of intensity modulated treatments of prostate cancer, including pre-treatment verification as well as verification during treatment. To assess its ability to intercept possible errors in dose delivery, clinically relevant errors were deliberately introduced into the dose distributions.
RESULTS: The developed gamma filter method proves successful in the efficient comparison of calculated versus measured IMRT dose distribution. Secondly, intercomparison of dosimetric images acquired during different treatment sessions illustrate its potential to highlight variations in the dosimetric images. The simulated errors were unmistakably intercepted.
CONCLUSIONS: The readily obtained gamma evaluation images are an easy tool for quality control of IMRT fields. To reduce the artefacts related to the discrete nature and limited resolution of the data, a fast and accurate filter cascade was developed, offering the possibility to use the gamma method for day to day evaluation of patient dosimetric portal images with or without comparison to a predicted portal dose distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12175562     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00497-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  65 in total

1.  Clinical implementation of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with ERGO++.

Authors:  Dirk Wolff; Florian Stieler; Brigitte Hermann; Katharina Heim; Sven Clausen; Jens Fleckenstein; Martin Polednik; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Practical guidelines for routine intensity-modulated radiotherapy verification: pre-treatment verification with portal dosimetry and treatment verification with in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  A J Vinall; A J Williams; V E Currie; A Van Esch; D Huyskens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Canny edge-based deformable image registration.

Authors:  Vasant Kearney; Yihui Huang; Weihua Mao; Baohong Yuan; Liping Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Anatomy-corresponding method of IMRT verification.

Authors:  Janusz Winiecki; Zbigniew Zurawski; Barbara Drzewiecka; Krzysztof Slosarek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-12-04

5.  Irregular surface compensation for radiotherapy of the breast: correlating depth of the compensation surface with breast size and resultant dose distribution.

Authors:  D J Emmens; H V James
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of global and local gamma evaluation results using isodose levels.

Authors:  Liting Yu; Tanya Kairn; Jamie V Trapp; Scott B Crowe
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-02-08

7.  Effects of Siemens TT-D carbon fiber table top on beam attenuation, and build up region of 6 MV photon beam.

Authors:  Asma Sheykhoo; Sara Abdollahi; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh Yazdi; Mahdi Ghorbani; Mohammad Mohammadi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-10-17

8.  Commissioning of 6 MV medical linac for dynamic MLC-based IMRT on Monte Carlo code GEANT4.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Yukio Fujita; Kyoko Sakama; Hidetoshi Saitoh; Tatsuaki Kanai; Jun Itami; Toshiyuki Kohno
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-02-08

9.  Dose calculation with respiration-averaged CT processed from cine CT without a respiratory surrogate.

Authors:  Adam C Riegel; Moiz Ahmad; Xiaojun Sun; Tinsu Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Development of a novel treatment planning test for credentialing rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Y Tsang; L Ciurlionis; C Clark; K Venables
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.