Literature DB >> 14528967

Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method.

Daniel A Low1, James F Dempsey.   

Abstract

The gamma tool was developed to quantitatively compare dose distributions, either measured or calculated. Before computing gamma, the dose and distance scales of the two distributions, referred to as evaluated and reference, are renormalized by dose and distance criteria, respectively. The renormalization allows the dose distribution comparison to be conducted simultaneously along dose and distance axes. The gamma quantity, calculated independently for each reference point, is the minimum distance in the renormalized multidimensional space between the evaluated distribution and the reference point. The gamma quantity degenerates to the dose-difference and distance-to-agreement tests in shallow and very steep dose gradient regions, respectively. Since being introduced, the gamma quantity has been used by investigators to evaluate dose calculation algorithms, and compare dosimetry measurements. This manuscript examines the gamma distribution behavior in two dimensions and evaluates the gamma distribution in the presence of data noise. Noise in the evaluated distribution causes the gamma distribution to be underestimated relative to the no-noise, condition. Noise in the reference distribution adds noise in the gamma distribution in proportion to the normalized dose noise. In typical clinical use, the fraction of points that exceed 3% and 3 mm can be extensive, so we typically use 5% and 2-3 mm in clinical evaluations. For clinical cases, the calculation time is typically 5 minutes for a 1 x 1 mm2 interpolated resolution on an 800 MHz Pentium 4 for a 14.1 x 15.2 cm2 radiographic film.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528967     DOI: 10.1118/1.1598711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  145 in total

1.  Toward a better understanding of the gamma index: Investigation of parameters with a surface-based distance method.

Authors:  Heng Li; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; James N Yang; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A method to evaluate dose errors introduced by dose mapping processes for mass conserving deformations.

Authors:  C Yan; G Hugo; F J Salguero; N Saleh-Sayah; E Weiss; W C Sleeman; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Niu; Warren D Foltz; Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Adil Al-Mayah; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Four-dimensional radiotherapeutic dose calculation using biomechanical respiratory motion description.

Authors:  Petru Manescu; Hamid Ladjal; Joseph Azencot; Michael Beuve; Etienne Testa; Behzad Shariat
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Deep learning-augmented radiotherapy visualization with a cylindrical radioluminescence system.

Authors:  Mengyu Jia; Xiaomeng Li; Yan Wu; Yong Yang; Priya Kasimbeg; Lawrie Skinner; Lei Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A practical three-dimensional dosimetry system for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pengyi Guo; John Adamovics; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fast, high-resolution 3D dosimetry utilizing a novel optical-CT scanner incorporating tertiary telecentric collimation.

Authors:  H S Sakhalkar; M Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Quasi-IMAT study with conventional equipment to show high plan quality with a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Judith Alvarez Moret; Oliver Kölbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  A comprehensive evaluation of the PRESAGE/optical-CT 3D dosimetry system.

Authors:  H S Sakhalkar; J Adamovics; G Ibbott; M Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dose calculation with respiration-averaged CT processed from cine CT without a respiratory surrogate.

Authors:  Adam C Riegel; Moiz Ahmad; Xiaojun Sun; Tinsu Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.