Literature DB >> 24322474

An autocalibrating algorithm for non-invasive cardiac output determination based on the analysis of an arterial pressure waveform recorded with radial artery applanation tonometry: a proof of concept pilot analysis.

Bernd Saugel1, Agnes S Meidert, Nicolas Langwieser, Julia Y Wagner, Florian Fassio, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Luisa M Prechtl, Wolfgang Huber, Roland M Schmid, Oliver Gödje.   

Abstract

We aimed to describe and evaluate an autocalibrating algorithm for determination of cardiac output (CO) based on the analysis of an arterial pressure (AP) waveform recorded using radial artery applanation tonometry (AT) in a continuous non-invasive manner. To exemplarily describe and evaluate the CO algorithm, we deliberately selected 22 intensive care unit patients with impeccable AP waveforms from a database including AP data obtained with AT (T-Line system; Tensys Medical Inc.). When recording AP data for this prospectively maintained database, we had simultaneously noted CO measurements obtained from just calibrated pulse contour analysis (PiCCO system; Pulsion Medical Systems) every minute. We applied the autocalibrating CO algorithm to the AT-derived AP waveforms and noted the computed CO values every minute during a total of 15 min of data recording per patient (3 × 5-min intervals). These 330 AT-derived CO (AT-CO) values were then statistically compared to the corresponding pulse contour CO (PC-CO) values. Mean ± standard deviation for PC-CO and AT-CO was 7.0 ± 2.0 and 6.9 ± 2.1 L/min, respectively. The coefficient of variation for PC-CO and AT-CO was 0.280 and 0.299, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias of +0.1 L/min (standard deviation 0.8 L/min; 95% limits of agreement -1.5 to 1.7 L/min, percentage error 23%). CO can be computed based on the analysis of the AP waveform recorded with AT. In the selected patients included in this pilot analysis, a percentage error of 23% indicates clinically acceptable agreement between AT-CO and PC-CO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322474     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9540-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  13 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Ron Dueck; Oliver Goedje; Paul Clopton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  A comparison of the Nexfin® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  O Broch; J Renner; M Gruenewald; P Meybohm; J Schöttler; A Caliebe; M Steinfath; M Malbrain; B Bein
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The T-Line TL-200 system for continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement in medical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Florian Fassio; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review.

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  Gregory M Janelle; Nikolaus Gravenstein
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  An evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter continuous noninvasive blood pressure device during induced hypotension.

Authors:  P Szmuk; E Pivalizza; R D Warters; T Ezri; R Gebhard
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period.

Authors:  Olfa Hamzaoui; Xavier Monnet; Christian Richard; David Osman; Denis Chemla; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

Authors:  Sujanthy S Rajaram; Nayan K Desai; Ankur Kalra; Mithil Gajera; Susan K Cavanaugh; William Brampton; Duncan Young; Sheila Harvey; Kathy Rowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Year in review in journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Steffen Rex; Thomas Scheeren; Lester Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui; M Higashi; I Schmidtmann; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A novel non-invasive blood pressure waveform measuring system compared to Millar applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Sándor Földi; Tamás Horváth; Flóra Zieger; Péter Sótonyi; György Cserey
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Annmarie Körner; Leonie Schulte-Uentrop; Mathias Kubik; Hermann Reichenspurner; Stefan Kluge; Daniel A Reuter; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Nicolas Langwieser; Luisa Prechtl; Agnes S Meidert; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Christian Bradaric; Tareq Ibrahim; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Roland M Schmid; Julia Y Wagner; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.

Authors:  C Maurer; J Y Wagner; R M Schmid; B Saugel
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 9.  Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: an overview of current cardiac output monitoring methods.

Authors:  Johan Huygh; Yannick Peeters; Jelle Bernards; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-12-16

Review 10.  Improving Perioperative Outcomes Through Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Techniques.

Authors:  Takashige Yamada; Susana Vacas; Yann Gricourt; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-05-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.