Literature DB >> 28980101

A novel non-invasive blood pressure waveform measuring system compared to Millar applanation tonometry.

Sándor Földi1, Tamás Horváth2, Flóra Zieger3, Péter Sótonyi4, György Cserey3.   

Abstract

The accurate, non-invasive, measuring of the continuous arterial blood pressure waveform faces some difficulties and an innovative blood pressure measurement technology is urgently needed. However, the arterial blood pressure waveform plays an essential role in health care by providing diagnostic information and base for calculating several heart function parameters. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel non-invasive measuring system that can measure the arterial blood pressure waveform with high accuracy in comparison to an applanation tonometry system. The applied measuring device utilizes a new measurement strategy enabled by the OptoForce 3D force sensor, which is attached to the wrist at the radial artery. To validate the accuracy, 30 simultaneous measurements were taken with a Millar tonometer. For the simultaneously recorded non-invasive signals, the similarity was high (the average correlation was [Formula: see text]). The differences in the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure measured by the two systems are small. The average differences ([Formula: see text]) for simultaneously recorded systolic, diastolic, mean arterial and incisura pressures were: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. These results satisfy the AAMI criteria. Based on our results, this new system requires further development and validation against invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in order to prove its usefulness in patient monitoring, emergency care, and pulse diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Applanation tonometry; Arterial pressure; Continuous blood pressure; Patient monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28980101     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0070-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

1.  Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement.

Authors:  C Ilies; M Bauer; P Berg; J Rosenberg; J Hedderich; B Bein; J Hinz; R Hanss
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  Gregory M Janelle; Nikolaus Gravenstein
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Ileana Negulescu; Miriam Schöfthaler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Wolfgang Huber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications.

Authors:  Elena Chung; Guo Chen; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Continuous blood pressure monitoring via non-invasive radial artery applanation tonometry and invasive arterial catheter demonstrates good agreement in patients undergoing colon carcinoma surgery.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Hanjian Chen; Jun Zheng; Bin Mao; Shengmei Zhu; Jingyi Feng
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin®.

Authors:  Jerson R Martina; Berend E Westerhof; Jeroen van Goudoever; Edouard M F H de Beaumont; Jasper Truijen; Yu-Sok Kim; Rogier V Immink; Dorothea A Jöbsis; Markus W Hollmann; Jaap R Lahpor; Bas A J M de Mol; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Wrist pulse signal diagnosis using modified Gaussian models and Fuzzy C-Means classification.

Authors:  Yinghui Chen; Lei Zhang; David Zhang; Dongyu Zhang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.

Authors:  Jurre Stens; Jeroen Oeben; Ab A Van Dusseldorp; Christa Boer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

View more
  3 in total

1.  Non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring revisited.

Authors:  Frederic Michard; Daniel I Sessler; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Multimodal Finger Pulse Wave Sensing: Comparison of Forcecardiography and Photoplethysmography Sensors.

Authors:  Emilio Andreozzi; Riccardo Sabbadini; Jessica Centracchio; Paolo Bifulco; Andrea Irace; Giovanni Breglio; Michele Riccio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.