Literature DB >> 25618259

Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Nicolas Langwieser1, Luisa Prechtl, Agnes S Meidert, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Christian Bradaric, Tareq Ibrahim, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Roland M Schmid, Julia Y Wagner, Bernd Saugel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic monitoring plays a pivotal role in the treatment of patients in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). The innovative radial artery applanation tonometry technology allows for continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (AP) measurement. By closing the gap between continuous invasive AP monitoring (arterial catheter) and intermittent noninvasive AP monitoring (oscillometry) this technology might improve CICU patient monitoring. We therefore aimed to evaluate the measurement performance of radial artery applanation tonometry in comparison with a radial arterial catheter in CICU patients.
METHODS: In this prospective method comparison study, we simultaneously recorded AP noninvasively with radial artery applanation tonometry (T-line 200 pro device; Tensys Medical Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and invasively with an arterial catheter (criterion standard) in 30 patients treated in the CICU of a German university hospital. We statistically analyzed 7,304 averaged 10-beat epochs of measurements of mean AP, systolic AP, and diastolic AP by using Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements.
RESULTS: Our study revealed a mean difference ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement; percentage error) between radial artery applanation tonometry and the criterion standard method (radial arterial catheter) of +2 ± 6 mmHg (-10 to +14 mmHg; 17%) for mean AP, -6 ± 11 mmHg (-28 to +15 mmHg; 20%) for systolic AP, and +4 ± 7 mmHg (-9 to +17 mmHg; 23%) for diastolic AP.
CONCLUSIONS: In CICU patients, continuous noninvasive measurement of AP using radial artery applanation tonometry is feasible. The technology showed reasonable accuracy and precision in comparison with radial arterial catheter-derived AP values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25618259     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-015-0816-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  24 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Ron Dueck; Oliver Goedje; Paul Clopton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The T-Line TL-200 system for continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement in medical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Florian Fassio; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman; Lynn A Sleeper; John G Webb; Vladimir Dzavik; Christopher E Buller; Philip Aylward; Jacques Col; Harvey D White
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure.

Authors:  A S Meidert; W Huber; J N Müller; M Schöfthaler; A Hapfelmeier; N Langwieser; J Y Wagner; F Eyer; R M Schmid; B Saugel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Kim; Marc Lilot; Kulraj S Sidhu; Joseph Rinehart; Zhaoxia Yu; Cecilia Canales; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Impact of rapid ventricular pacing during TAVI on microvascular tissue perfusion.

Authors:  Anna Selle; Hans R Figulla; Markus Ferrari; Wilma Rademacher; Bjoern Goebel; Ali Hamadanchi; Marcus Franz; Andrea Schlueter; Thomas Lehmann; Alexander Lauten
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Are we ready for the age of non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring?

Authors:  B Saugel; D A Reuter
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Atsushi Iga; Kenji Wagatsuma; Junichi Yamazaki; Takanori Ikeda
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.022

10.  An autocalibrating algorithm for non-invasive cardiac output determination based on the analysis of an arterial pressure waveform recorded with radial artery applanation tonometry: a proof of concept pilot analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Agnes S Meidert; Nicolas Langwieser; Julia Y Wagner; Florian Fassio; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Luisa M Prechtl; Wolfgang Huber; Roland M Schmid; Oliver Gödje
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.502

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of blood pressure monitoring by applanation tonometry and invasively assessed blood pressure in cardiological patients.

Authors:  G Greiwe; S Hoffmann; L Herich; M S Winkler; C J Trepte; C R Behem; M Petzoldt; D A Reuter; S A Haas
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Uncertainty Quantification in a Patient-Specific One-Dimensional Arterial Network Model: EnKF-Based Inflow Estimator.

Authors:  Andrea Arnold; Christina Battista; Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo German; Ricardo L Armentano; Hien Tran; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2017-02-22

3.  Avoiding Heparinization of Arterial Line and Maintaining Acceptable Arterial Waveform After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Azin Alizadehasl; Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Mohammadmehdi Peighambari; Rasoul Azarfarin; Ghodrat Golbargian; Hooman Bakhshandeh
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 4.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight®) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section-A Retrospective Validation Study.

Authors:  Philipp Helmer; Daniel Helf; Michael Sammeth; Bernd Winkler; Sebastian Hottenrott; Patrick Meybohm; Peter Kranke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Improving Perioperative Outcomes Through Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Techniques.

Authors:  Takashige Yamada; Susana Vacas; Yann Gricourt; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Comparison of a pressure-sensing sheath and radial arterial line for intraoperative blood pressure monitoring in neurointerventional procedures.

Authors:  Michael T Froehler; Rohan Chitale; Jordan A Magarik; Matthew R Fusco
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Theodore G Papaioannou; Stamatia Pagoulatou; Georgios Rovas; Evangelos Oikonomou; Gerasimos Siasos; Dimitris Tousoulis; Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.