Literature DB >> 26676240

Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.

C Maurer1, J Y Wagner2, R M Schmid1, B Saugel3.   

Abstract

When treating acutely ill patients in the emergency department (ED), the successful management of a variety of medical conditions, such as sepsis, acute kidney injury, and pancreatitis, is highly dependent on the correct assessment and optimization of a patient's intravascular volume status. Therefore, it is crucial that the ED physician knows and uses available means to assess intravascular volume status to adequately guide fluid therapy. This review focuses on techniques for volume status assessment that are available in the ED including basic clinical and laboratory findings, apparatus-based tests such as sonography and chest x-ray, and functional tests to evaluate fluid responsiveness. Furthermore, we provide an outlook on promising innovative, noninvasive technologies that might be used for advanced hemodynamic monitoring in the ED.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring; Fluid challenge; Fluid deficiency; Noninvasive cardiac output; Passive leg raising; Sepsis; Shock; Volume therapy

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26676240     DOI： 10.1007/s00063-015-0124-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN： 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  77 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure measurement based on radial artery tonometry in the intensive care unit: a method comparison study using the T-Line TL-200pro device.

Authors:  B Saugel; A S Meidert; A Hapfelmeier; F Eyer; R M Schmid; W Huber
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The use of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing patients to assess dynamic arterial elastance and to predict arterial pressure response to fluid administration.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; M Ignacio Monge García; Manuel Gracia Romero; Johannes Mellinghoff; Francesca Caliandro; Robert Michael Grounds; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Bechien U Wu; Peter A Banks
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Clinical evaluation of circulating blood volume in critically ill patients--contribution of a clinical scoring system.

Authors:  F Stéphan; A Flahault; N Dieudonné; J Hollande; F Paillard; F Bonnet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  What is a fluid challenge?

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Anthony K Parsons; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 7.  Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure?

Authors:  Charlie S Wang; J Mark FitzGerald; Michael Schulzer; Edwin Mak; Najib T Ayas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sébastien Préau; Fabienne Saulnier; Florent Dewavrin; Alain Durocher; Jean-Luc Chagnon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Evaluation of the portable chest roentgenogram for quantitating extravascular lung water in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B D Halperin; T W Feeley; F G Mihm; C Chiles; D F Guthaner; N E Blank
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed H Elwan; Ashraf Roshdy; Eman M Elsharkawy; Salah M Eltahan; Timothy J Coats
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study.

Authors:  David McGregor; Shrey Sharma; Saksham Gupta; Shanaz Ahmed; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Salvador Menendez Ramirez
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-12

4.  The PCQP Score for Volume Status of Acutely Ill Patients: Integrating Vascular Pedicle Width, Caval Index, Respiratory Variability of the QRS Complex and R Wave Amplitude.

Authors:  Ali Taghizadieh; Kavous Shahsavari Nia; Payman Moharramzadeh; Mahboob Pouraghaei; Atefeh Ghavidel; Zahra Parsian; Ata Mahmoodpoor
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11

5.  Comparison of vena cava distensibility index and pulse pressure variation for the evaluation of intravascular volume in critically ill children.

Authors:  Başak Akyıldız; Serkan Özsoylu
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.990
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.