Jens Hoffmann1, Gunamony Shajan, Klaus Scheffler, Rolf Pohmann. 1. High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 41, 72076, Tübingen, Germany, jens.hoffmann@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a numerical and experimental investigation of the static RF shimming capabilities in the human brain at 9.4 T using a dual-row transmit array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed numerical model of an existing 16-channel, inductively decoupled dual-row array was constructed using time-domain software together with circuit co-simulation. Experiments were conducted on a 9.4 T scanner. Investigation of RF shimming focused on B1(+) homogeneity, efficiency and local specific absorption rate (SAR) when applied to large brain volumes and on a slice-by-slice basis. RESULTS: Numerical results were consistent with experiments regarding component values, S-parameters and B1(+) pattern, though the B1(+) field was about 25% weaker in measurements than simulations. Global shim settings were able to prevent B1(+) field voids across the entire brain but the capability to simultaneously reduce inhomogeneities was limited. On a slice-by-slice basis, B1(+) standard deviations of below 10% without field dropouts could be achieved in axial, sagittal and coronal orientations across the brain, even with phase-only shimming, but decreased B1(+) efficiency and SAR limitations must be considered. CONCLUSION: Dual-row transmit arrays facilitate flexible 3D RF management across the entire brain at 9.4 T in order to trade off B1(+) homogeneity against power-efficiency and local SAR.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a numerical and experimental investigation of the static RF shimming capabilities in the human brain at 9.4 T using a dual-row transmit array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed numerical model of an existing 16-channel, inductively decoupled dual-row array was constructed using time-domain software together with circuit co-simulation. Experiments were conducted on a 9.4 T scanner. Investigation of RF shimming focused on B1(+) homogeneity, efficiency and local specific absorption rate (SAR) when applied to large brain volumes and on a slice-by-slice basis. RESULTS: Numerical results were consistent with experiments regarding component values, S-parameters and B1(+) pattern, though the B1(+) field was about 25% weaker in measurements than simulations. Global shim settings were able to prevent B1(+) field voids across the entire brain but the capability to simultaneously reduce inhomogeneities was limited. On a slice-by-slice basis, B1(+) standard deviations of below 10% without field dropouts could be achieved in axial, sagittal and coronal orientations across the brain, even with phase-only shimming, but decreased B1(+) efficiency and SAR limitations must be considered. CONCLUSION: Dual-row transmit arrays facilitate flexible 3D RF management across the entire brain at 9.4 T in order to trade off B1(+) homogeneity against power-efficiency and local SAR.
Authors: Qing X Yang; Jinghua Wang; Xiaoliang Zhang; Christopher M Collins; Michael B Smith; Haiying Liu; Xiao-Hong Zhu; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Thomas Vaughan; Lance DelaBarre; Carl Snyder; Jinfeng Tian; Can Akgun; Devashish Shrivastava; Wanzahn Liu; Chris Olson; Gregor Adriany; John Strupp; Peter Andersen; Anand Gopinath; Pierre-Francois van de Moortele; Michael Garwood; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bob van den Bergen; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Dennis W J Klomp; Jan J W Lagendijk Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kawin Setsompop; Vijayanand Alagappan; Borjan Gagoski; Thomas Witzel; Jonathan Polimeni; Andreas Potthast; Franz Hebrank; Ulrich Fontius; Franz Schmitt; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christian Mirkes; Gunamony Shajan; Grzegorz Chadzynski; Kai Buckenmaier; Benjamin Bender; Klaus Scheffler Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Xin Li; Jullie W Pan; Nikolai I Avdievich; Hoby P Hetherington; Joseph V Rispoli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Mary Kate Manhard; Jason Stockmann; Congyu Liao; Daniel Park; Sohyun Han; Merlin Fair; Maaike van den Boomen; Jon Polimeni; Berkin Bilgic; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Desmond H Y Tse; Christopher J Wiggins; Dimo Ivanov; Daniel Brenner; Jens Hoffmann; Christian Mirkes; Gunamony Shajan; Klaus Scheffler; Kâmil Uludağ; Benedikt A Poser Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 2.310