Literature DB >> 24203278

Phonetic recoding and reading difficulty in beginning readers.

L S Mark1, D Shankweiler, I Y Liberman, C A Fowler.   

Abstract

The results of a recent study (Liberman, Shankweiler, Liberman, Fowler, & Fischer, 1977) suggest that good beginning readers are more affected than poor readers by the phonetic characteristics of visually presented items in a recall task. The good readers made significantly more recall errors on strings of letters with rhyming letter names than on nonrhyming sequences; in contrast, the poor readers made roughly equal numbers of errors on the rhyming and nonrhyming letter strings. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the interaction between reading ability and phonetic similarity is solely determined by different rehearsal strategies of the two groups. Accordingly, good and poor readers were tested on rhyming and nonrhyming words using a recognition memory paradigm that minimized the opportunity for rehearsal. Performance of the good readers was more affected by phonetic similarity than that of the poor readers, in agreement with the earlier study. The present findings support the hypothesis that good and poor readers do differ in their ability to access a phonetic representation.

Year:  1977        PMID: 24203278     DOI: 10.3758/BF03197408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Verbal vs non-verbal paired-associates learning in poor and normal readers.

Authors:  F R Vellutino; J A Steger; C J Harding; F Phillips
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Visual perception in the brain-injured child.

Authors:  M FROSTIG
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1963-07

3.  Specific reading disability: delineation of the syndrome and relationship to cerebral dominance.

Authors:  A A SILVER; R HAGIN
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 3.735

4.  Immediate visual recall in poor and normal readers as a function of orthographic-linguistic familiarity.

Authors:  F R Vellutino; R M Pruzek; J A Steger; U Meshoulam
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Reading disability: an investigation of the perceptual deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  F R Vellutino; J A Steger; G Kandel
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory?

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Effects of acoustic and semantic similarity on short-term paired-associate learning.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

8.  Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English consonants.

Authors:  W A Wickelgren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Errors in short-term memory for good and poor readers.

Authors:  S Brady; V Mann; R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-09

2.  Semantic and phonetic memory codes in beginning readers.

Authors:  B Byrne; P Shea
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-09

3.  The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks.

Authors:  C Holligan; R S Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

4.  Children's memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability.

Authors:  V A Mann; I Y Liberman; D Shankweiler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-07

5.  Phonetic analysis of speech and memory codes in beginning readers.

Authors:  J Alegria; E Pignot; J Morais
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-09

6.  Immediate memory for pseudowords and phonological awareness are associated in adults and pre-reading children.

Authors:  Nathaniel B Clark; Gerald W McRoberts; Julie A Van Dyke; Donald P Shankweiler; David Braze
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Short-term memory, phonological processing, and reading ability.

Authors:  S Brady
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1986-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.