Literature DB >> 4784694

Immediate visual recall in poor and normal readers as a function of orthographic-linguistic familiarity.

F R Vellutino, R M Pruzek, J A Steger, U Meshoulam.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4784694     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(73)80036-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Word length, phonemic, and visual similarity effects in poor and normal readers.

Authors:  Alan M McNeil; Rhona S Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

2.  Phonetic recoding and reading difficulty in beginning readers.

Authors:  L S Mark; D Shankweiler; I Y Liberman; C A Fowler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

3.  Poor readers' use of orthographic information in learning to read new words: a visual bias or a phonological deficit?

Authors:  Alan M McNeil; Rhona S Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

4.  Errors in short-term memory for good and poor readers.

Authors:  S Brady; V Mann; R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-09

5.  Perceptual grouping in good and poor readers.

Authors:  M C Williams; N B Bologna
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

6.  The effects of manual tracing on memory in normal and retarded readers: some implications for multi-sensory teaching.

Authors:  C Hulme
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1981

Review 7.  Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them.

Authors:  Michael Hebert; Devin M Kearns; Joanne Baker Hayes; Pamela Bazis; Samantha Cooper
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Short-term memory, phonological processing, and reading ability.

Authors:  S Brady
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1986-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.