Literature DB >> 33163753

Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Lawrence R MacDonald1, Joseph Y Lo2, Gregory M Sturgeon2, Chengeng Zeng1, Robert L Harrison1, Paul E Kinahan1, William Paul Segars2.   

Abstract

We investigated PET image quantification when using a uniform attenuation coefficient (μ) for attenuation correction (AC) of anthropomorphic density phantoms derived from high-resolution breast CT scans. A breast PET system was modeled with perfect data corrections except for AC. Using uniform μ for AC resulted in quantitative errors roughly proportional to the difference between μ used in ACAC) and local μ, yielding approximately ± 5% bias, corresponding to the variation of μ for 511 keV photons in breast tissue. Global bias was lowest when uniform μ AC was equal to the phantom mean μ (μ mean). Local bias in 10-mm spheres increased as the sphere μ deviated from μ mean, but remained only 2-3% when the μ sphere was 6.5% higher than μ mean. Bias varied linearly with and was roughly proportional to local μ mismatch. Minimizing local bias, e.g., in a small sphere, required the use of a uniform μ value between the local μ and the μ mean. Thus, biases from using uniform-μ AC are low when local μ sphere is close to μ mean. As the μ sphere increasingly differs from the phantom μ mean, bias increases, and the optimal uniform μ is less predictable, having a value between μ sphere and the phantom μ mean.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Breast PET; Positron Emission Tomography; Quantitative PET; Simulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33163753      PMCID: PMC7643852          DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.2991120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  28 in total

1.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Positron Emission Mammography Image Interpretation for Reduced Image Count Levels.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Daniel S Hippe; Leila C Bender; Elizabeth W Cotter; Pooja R Voria; Paula S Hallam; Carolyn L Wang; David R Haseley; Mary M Kelly; Jay R Parikh; J David Beatty; James V Rogers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Quantification with a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Spencer L Bowen; Andrea Ferrero; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

5.  Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Jean-Luc Moretti; Raphael Porcher; Marc Espié; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Anne de Roquancourt; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Caroline Cuvier; Laetitia Vercellino; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Prospective Clinical Trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Determining the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Debra A Goldman; Adriana Corben; Serge K Lyashchenko; Mithat Gönen; Jason S Lewis; Maura Dickler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Chengeng Zeng; Paul E Kinahan; Hua Qian; Robert L Harrison; Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-30

8.  Design Optimization of a TOF, Breast PET Scanner.

Authors:  Eunsin Lee; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; David A Mankoff; Thomas Lawton; Kevin Yagle; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Allen Gown; Jeanne M Link; Timothy Tewson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Will Van Kampen; Alexander V Stolin; Wenbo Gong; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone; Mark F Smith; David Sarment; Neal H Clinthorne; Mark Perna
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Trevor Vent; Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D A Maidment; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.