Literature DB >> 18460745

Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

S Surti1, J S Karp.   

Abstract

Development of partial ring, dedicated breast positron emission tomography (PET) scanners is an active area of research. Due to the limited angular coverage, generation of distortion and artifact-free, fully 3D tomographic images is not possible without rotation of the detectors. With time-of-flight (TOF) information, it is possible to achieve the 3D tomographic images with limited angular coverage and without detector rotation. We performed simulations for a breast scanner design with a ring diameter and an axial length of 15 cm and comprising a full (180 degrees in-plane angular coverage), 2/3 (120 degrees in-plane angular coverage) or 1/2 (90 degrees in-plane angular coverage) ring detector. Our results show that as the angular coverage decreases, improved timing resolution is needed to achieve distortion-free and artifact-free images with TOF. The contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) value for small hot lesions in a partial ring scanner is similar to a full ring non-TOF scanner. Our results indicate that a timing resolution of 600 ps is needed for a 2/3 ring scanner, while a timing resolution of 300 ps is needed for a 1/2 ring scanner. We also analyzed the ratio of lesion CRC to the background pixel noise (SNR) and concluded that TOF improves the SNR values of the partial ring scanner, and helps to compensate for the loss in sensitivity due to reduced geometric sensitivity in a limited angle coverage PET scanner. In particular, it is possible to maintain similar SNR characteristic in a 2/3 ring scanner with a timing resolution of 300 ps as in a full ring non-TOF scanner.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460745      PMCID: PMC2636558          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp; G Muehllehner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti; Bernard Bendriem; Mike Casey; Mu Chen; Frank Kehren; Christian Michel; Vladimir Panin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp; Lucretiu M Popescu; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Matthew Werner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Fast reconstruction of 3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Robert M Lewitt; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

Authors:  C J Thompson; K Murthy; I N Weinberg; F Mako
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  R R Raylman; S Majewski; A G Weisenberger; V Popov; R Wojcik; B Kross; J S Schreiman; H A Bishop
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin Kuhn; Matthew E Werner; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey Kolthammer; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Impact of high energy resolution detectors on the performance of a PET system dedicated to breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Craig S Levin; Angela M K Foudray; Frezghi Habte
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.685

View more
  30 in total

1.  Physical effects of mechanical design parameters on photon sensitivity and spatial resolution performance of a breast-dedicated PET system.

Authors:  V C Spanoudaki; F W Y Lau; A Vandenbroucke; C S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Performance Evaluation of a Newly Developed MR-Compatible Mobile PET Scanner with Two Detector Layouts.

Authors:  Masao Watanabe; Yuji Nakamoto; Ryusuke Nakamoto; Takayoshi Ishimori; Tsuneo Saga; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of sequential PET/MRI using a newly developed mobile PET system for brain imaging.

Authors:  Mizue Suzuki; Yasutaka Fushimi; Tomohisa Okada; Takuya Hinoda; Ryusuke Nakamoto; Yoshiki Arakawa; Nobukatsu Sawamoto; Kaori Togashi; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Update on novel trends in PET/CT technology and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Michel Hesse; François Jamar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The Effect of Defective PET Detectors in Clinical Simultaneous [18F]FDG Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Gaspar Delso; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Design study of a dedicated head and neck cancer PET system.

Authors:  Mohan Li; Brett Yockey; Shiva Abbaszadeh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-08

8.  Two-crossed-polarizers based optical property modulation method for ionizing radiation detection for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Yuli Wang; Yingjie Li; Fei Yi; Junyu Li; Siwei Xie; Qiyu Peng; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Stan Majewski; Paul E Kinahan; Robert L Harrison; Brian F Elston; Ravindra Manjeshwar; Sergei Dolinsky; Alexander V Stolin; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.