Literature DB >> 18199907

The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements.

Raymond R Raylman1, Stan Majewski, Mark F Smith, James Proffitt, William Hammond, Amarnath Srinivasan, John McKisson, Vladimir Popov, Andrew Weisenberger, Clifford O Judy, Brian Kross, Srikanth Ramasubramanian, Larry E Banta, Paul E Kinahan, Kyle Champley.   

Abstract

Tomographic breast imaging techniques can potentially improve detection and diagnosis of cancer in women with radiodense and/or fibrocystic breasts. We have developed a high-resolution positron emission mammography/tomography imaging and biopsy device (called PEM/PET) to detect and guide the biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. PET images are acquired to detect suspicious focal uptake of the radiotracer and guide biopsy of the area. Limited-angle PEM images could then be used to verify the biopsy needle position prior to tissue sampling. The PEM/PET scanner consists of two sets of rotating planar detector heads. Each detector consists of a 4 x 3 array of Hamamatsu H8500 flat panel position sensitive photomultipliers (PSPMTs) coupled to a 96 x 72 array of 2 x 2 x 15 mm(3) LYSO detector elements (pitch = 2.1 mm). Image reconstruction is performed with a three-dimensional, ordered set expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm parallelized to run on a multi-processor computer system. The reconstructed field of view (FOV) is 15 x 15 x 15 cm(3). Initial phantom-based testing of the device is focusing upon its PET imaging capabilities. Specifically, spatial resolution and detection sensitivity were assessed. The results from these measurements yielded a spatial resolution at the center of the FOV of 2.01 +/- 0.09 mm (radial), 2.04 +/- 0.08 mm (tangential) and 1.84 +/- 0.07 mm (axial). At a radius of 7 cm from the center of the scanner, the results were 2.11 +/- 0.08 mm (radial), 2.16 +/- 0.07 mm (tangential) and 1.87 +/- 0.08 mm (axial). Maximum system detection sensitivity of the scanner is 488.9 kcps microCi(-1) ml(-1) (6.88%). These promising findings indicate that PEM/PET may be an effective system for the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199907     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  39 in total

1.  Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nicholas A Shkumat; Adam Springer; Christopher M Walker; Eric M Rohren; Wei T Yang; Beatriz E Adrada; Elsa Arribas; Selin Carkaci; Hubert H Chuang; Lumarie Santiago; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Physical effects of mechanical design parameters on photon sensitivity and spatial resolution performance of a breast-dedicated PET system.

Authors:  V C Spanoudaki; F W Y Lau; A Vandenbroucke; C S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Novel detector technology for clinical PET.

Authors:  Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Integration of microwave tomography with magnetic resonance for improved breast imaging.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Amir H Golnabi; Neil R Epstein; Shireen D Geimer; Margaret W Fanning; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  DOI-based reconstruction algorithms for a compact breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald; Thomas K Lewellen; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  PET Molecular Imaging-Directed Biopsy: A Review.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; David M Schuster
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylmana; Mark F Smith; Paul E Kinahan; Stan Majewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.