Literature DB >> 24059846

Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Eva Reinisch1, Lori L Holt1.   

Abstract

Listeners use lexical knowledge to retune phoneme categories. When hearing an ambiguous sound between /s/ and /f/ in lexically unambiguous contexts such as gira[s/f], listeners learn to interpret the sound as /f/ because gira[f] is a real word and gira[s] is not. Later, they apply this learning even in lexically ambiguous contexts (perceiving knife rather than nice). Although such retuning could help listeners adapt to foreign-accented speech, research has focused on single phonetic contrasts artificially manipulated to create ambiguous sounds; however, accented speech varies along many dimensions. It is therefore unclear whether analogies to adaptation to accented speech are warranted. In the present studies, the to-be-adapted ambiguous sound was embedded in a global foreign accent. In addition, conditions of cross-speaker generalization were tested with focus on the extent to which perceptual similarity between 2 speakers' fricatives is a condition for generalization to occur. Results showed that listeners retune phoneme categories manipulated within the context of a global foreign accent, and that they generalize this short-term learning to the perception of phonemes from previously unheard speakers. However, generalization was observed only when exposure and test speakers' fricatives were sampled across a similar perceptual space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24059846      PMCID: PMC3962813          DOI: 10.1037/a0034409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  32 in total

1.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate. II: Effects of signal discontinuities.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; R S Newman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Andrea Weber; Holger Mitterer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The bounds on flexibility in speech perception.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception.

Authors:  K P Green; G R Tomiak; P K Kuhl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-07

7.  Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Marijt J Witteman; Andrea Weber; James M McQueen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  The dynamic nature of speech perception.

Authors:  James M McQueen; Dennis Norris; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Specificity and generalization in perceptual adaptation to accented speech.

Authors:  Jessica E D Alexander; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Linguistically guided adaptation to foreign-accented speech.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-04-21

6.  Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Sonia A Krol; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-08

7.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; David R Wozny; Holger Mitterer; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-07-01

8.  Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Sleep Facilitates Generalisation of Accent Adaptation to a New Talker.

Authors:  Xin Xie; F Sayako Earle; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.