Literature DB >> 9259636

The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception.

K P Green1, G R Tomiak, P K Kuhl.   

Abstract

The acoustic structure of the speech signal is extremely variable due to a variety of contextual factors, including talker characteristics and speaking rate. To account for the listener's ability to adjust to this variability, speech researchers have posited the existence of talker and rate normalization processes. The current study examined how the perceptual system encoded information about talker and speaking rate during phonetic perception. Experiments 1-3 examined this question, using a speeded classification paradigm developed by Garner (1974). The results of these experiments indicated that decisions about phonemic identity were affected by both talker and rate information: irrelevant variation in either dimension interfered with phonemic classification. While rate classification was also affected by phoneme variation, talker classification was not. Experiment 4 examined the impact of talker and rate variation on the voicing boundary under different blocking conditions. The results indicated that talker characteristics influenced the voicing boundary when talker variation occurred within a block of trials only under certain conditions. Rate variation, however, influenced the voicing boundary regardless of whether or not there was rate variation within a block of trials. The findings from these experiments indicate that phoneme and the rate information are encoded in an integral manner during speech perception, while talker characteristics are encoded separately.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9259636     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 4.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Jiyeon Lee; Louisa Y Y Ha; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The development of language-specific and language-independent talker processing.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.

Authors:  Susannahv Levi
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2017-06-09

9.  Dyslexia Limits the Ability to Categorize Talker Dialect.

Authors:  Gayle Beam Long; Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Elly R Hu; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.